PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-013/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Bilaspur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bilaspur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
2.178
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bilaspur
2.178
Undemarcated Protected Forest
Total
2.178
Division 1. : Bilaspur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Bilaspur
2.178
Total
2.178
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.178
0.01
Eco 5
Total.
2.178
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Catechu
Khair
9
0
0
0
0
0
2
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Chil( Pinus roxburghii Sargent
60
21
1
0
0
0
5
Others
Kamal ( Saussurea obvallata
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Balodhar ( Sapium insigne(Royle) Benth
3
0
0
0
0
0
Total
75
21
1
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
97
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
As per working plan the area has been prescription under chil working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No danger due to erosion in the area as such the soil strata is rocky.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.500
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wild boar, Monkey, Crow Sparrows Jackels etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
As per note on vialotion uploaded
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
1980
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
1.2705
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
There is no record available in this office about the action taken against violators. However as per Para 1.21(ii), Bill on a/c of Penal NPV has already been raised and placed in proposal folders.
There is no record available in this office about the action taken against violators. However as per Para 1.21(ii), Bill on a/c of Penal NPV has already been raised and placed in proposal folders.
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
10.25
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
4.356
DPF Sadyar
Ghumarwin
H43E11
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Recommendation of D.C.F. Bilaspur
2
aerial distance
3
Note on Violation
4
Penal NPV
5
Land Suitability certificate
6
NPV Bill
7
Location Map
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Bilaspur
116700
42800
772.6072
80
1724.425
31/03/2021
1454.0155
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Yes
One
18/07/2020
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Recommended
The land proposed for diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum hence recommended.
Bilaspur
CF
Recommended
The land proposed for diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum hence recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
13/12/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×