PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0172/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Shimla
(iii)
Forest Division :
Rampur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
3.2193
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Rampur
2.7513
Unclassed Forests
2
Rampur
0.468
Protected Forest
Total
3.2193
Division 1. : Rampur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Shimla
3.2193
Total
3.2193
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.2193
0.04
Eco 6
Total.
3.2193
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Deodar (Cedrus deodara)
0
1
3
0
0
0
2
Others
Kail (Pinus wallichiana)
16
17
6
1
0
0
3
Others
Rai (Picea smithiana)
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
Others
Ban (Quercus leucotricophora)
0
4
1
0
0
0
5
Others
Chil (Pinus roxburghii)
14
7
2
0
0
0
Total
30
29
12
2
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
73
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area falls under Deo/Kail PB-III circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not seriously eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wolf (Canis pallips), India Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Indian porcupine (Hystrix indica), Brown flying squirrel (Peeromys petaurista), Monkey (Macac malatta), Jackal (Canis aureus), Hill mouse (Mos homourus)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
The user agency has violated the provisions of FCA
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2006
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
3.0063
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
XEN HPPWD Rampur
Executive Engineer HPPWD Rampur Bushahr
The committee constituted vide judgement of the Honble High Court of Himachal Pradesh
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
1173722
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
6.4386
D-18 (Punan) C-4
Nankhari
D-18 (Punan) C-4
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Bill of NPV
2
Certificate of no plantation has been done
3
Certificate of no trees standing
4
Detail of Private land
5
Certificate for minimum use of forest land
6
Undertaking regarding CA
7
Site inspection report
8
Details of non-forest land/degraded forest area identified for CA
9
Detailed CA & Penal CA Scheme
10
Joint inspection report
11
Map of the project site
12
Panalty bill of NPV
13
Plantation scheme for muck lumping
14
Revised Part-II
15
Land suitability certificate by DFO
16
Undertaking
17
Undertaking for possibility to shift the dumping site
18
Undertaking regarding NPV & addl. NPV
19
Justification
20
Check list 19
21
Detail of forest land
22
DGPS map of proposed road
23
Certificate W.L. Sanctuary
24
Bill of Penal NPV
25
Cost of trees
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Shimla
129848
39420.92
779.2131
101
1603.0192
31/03/2022
1715.5798
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Yes
One
20/06/2022
Rampur
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Recommended
The case is recommended for approval please
Rampur
CF
Recommended
Justification as per the check list No.10 is placed in the proposal folders.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
01/09/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×