PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0127/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Shimla
(iii)
Forest Division :
Rampur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1.9683
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Rampur
0.9991
Unclassed Forests
2
Rampur
0.9692
Protected Forest
Total
1.9683
Division 1. : Rampur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Shimla
1.9683
Total
1.9683
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.9683
0.05
Eco 6
Total.
1.9683
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Pinus wallichiana (Kail)
6
0
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Cedrus deodara (Deodar)
18
19
5
0
0
0
Total
24
19
5
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
48
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area falls under Deo/Kail PB-III working circle as per the working plan.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not seriously eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Morus alba (Toot), Pinus roxburghii (Chil), Prunus armenniaca (Chulli), Prunus persica (Aaroo), Pyrus pashia (Kainth), Taxus baccata (Thuna), Wolf (Canis pallips), India Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Indian porcupine (Hystrix indica), Brown flying squirrel (Peeromys petaurista), Monkey (Macac malatta), Jackal (Canis aureus), Hill mouse (Mos homourus), Cheer pheasant (Catreus wallichii), Chakor partridge (Alectoris graeca) & House crow (Corvus splendens)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
The detail of violation is enclosed as additional
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2006
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.8023
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
XEN HPPWD
Executive Engineer HPPWD Division Rampur
Action taken against the persons is enclosed place at page No. 51-55 of the proposal folders.
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
1106474
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
3.9366
D-18 (PUNAN) C-4
Nankhari
D-18 (PUNAN) C-4
View file
2
2
1.6040
D-18 (PUNAN) C-4
Nankhari
D-18 (PUNAN) C-4
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
DGPS map of CA & Penal CA
2
Penalty bill of NPV
3
Justification
4
Detail of Forest land
5
undertaking regarding reclamation of dumping site
6
Undertaking for possibility to shift the dumping site to non forest area
7
Check list 19
8
land suitability certificate
9
Violation inspection report
10
Bill of NPV
11
certificate regarding no plantation work has been carried out
12
EDS Reply 26/12/2024
13
Muck management plan
14
List of Roads
15
Revised enumeration list
16
Action taken Report against violators
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Shimla
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Yes
One
20/06/2022
Rampur
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Recommended
The case has been recommended for approval please.
Rampur
CF
Recommended
The justification as per the check list No.10 is placed in the proposal folders
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
30/01/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×