PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-044/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Shimla  (iii) Forest Division : Shimla(shimla)  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.4794  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Shimla(shimla)5.4794Demarcated Protected Forest 15 Drawal, Up Protected Forest 16 Karyali and 19 Groan Jaishi
Total 5.4794
Division 1. : Shimla(shimla)
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Shimla5.4794
Total5.4794
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
15.47940.075Eco 6
Total. 5.4794


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersCeltis australis) Khirk1400000
2OthersZizyphus mauritiana Bair200000
3OthersPrunus armeniaca Chulli700000
4OthersPinus roxburghii Chil55154000
5OthersMelia Azadirachta Dreak100000
6OthersMallotus philippinensis Kambal3500000
7OthersSalix alba Bad230000
8OthersAnacardium Occidentale Pechaka2340000
9OthersToona ciliata Tuni1000000
10OthersBauhinia variegata Karyal1000000
11OthersBaloja4200000
12OthersDalburgia Sisoo Shisam700000
13OthersAegle Marmelos Bil400000
14OthersGrevia optiva Beul1100000
15OthersMelia Azadirachta Darak5700000
16OthersPistacia integerrima Kakar001000
17OthersBombax ceiba Semble004000
Total 280 229 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 311


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : D-15 Drawal, U-16 Karyali & U-19 Groan Jaishi has been prescribed as Plantation, Biosphere and Plantation working circles as per working plan
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area for the diversion is vulnerability to forest erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No major wild life species present but few bird species can be found in and around. Detail bird species is as under: Bulbul (Red vented Bulbul,),Parakeet etc.Barbet
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 2904432
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1111UPF Bhara DrablaBhajji(Sunni)UPF Bhara Drabla    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NPV bill
2 Check List No 7
3 Trees
4 Resolution passed in the Gram Panchayat, Karyali on 05.06.2023
5 Certificate regarding WLS
6 Joint Inspection Report conducted on 16th May, 2024 in compliance to the Sub-Office, Shimla (Regional Office, Chandigarh), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India letter No. FC/HPC/65/2023 issued in the month of April, 2024.

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Shimla51310032198.34405.9725162767.18631/03/2022644.164.79
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Shimla(shimla)ShimlaDFOYesOne14/12/2022
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Shimla(shimla)ShimlaDFO RecommendedRecommended under FCA 1980
ShimlaCF RecommendedRecommended for approval under FCA 1980Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended17/04/2023RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShimlaRegional OfficeFC/HPC/65/202307/08/2024
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/143552/2021ROAD14355220213999,141,076.009,141,080.002024-10-21RBI2962480729602Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)NANA
19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
  (i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal : Yes   (ii). Total Land identified for raising CA: 11   (iii). No. of Maintenance years: 10   (iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel: 1
  No. of patches : 1
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1Block(Polygon)11
  Status of CA Land so identified : Forest Area   Site Name : UPF-14 Bhara Drabla   Location Details : UPF -14-Bhara Drabla under ranje Bhajji Shimla   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest. Legal Status of Forest Land
Bhara DrablaOthers
20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.Verified DateMutation LetterRemarks
FP/HP/ROAD/143552/202118 Dec 2024No DataCA has been proposed over degraded Forest land, hence mutation is not required.
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/143552/2021Approved In-PrincipleNo Data