PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-0158/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Kangra  (iii) Forest Division : D/sala  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.9696  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1D/sala2.9696Un-Protected Forests
Total 2.9696
Division 1. : D/sala
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kangra2.9696
Total2.9696
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
12.96960.3Eco 6
Total. 2.9696


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersChil - Pinus roxburghii0000410
2OthersDagur - Ficus hispida0789000
3OthersKainth - Pyrus pashia050000
4OthersKhirak - Celtis australis0113000
5Albzzia Spp.Ohi - Albizzia stipulata000003
6OthersPajja - Prunus padus030000
7OthersPuna - Ehretia acuminata053000
8OthersKathaman - Fugenia jambolanea011000
9OthersToot - Morus alba052000
10OthersRumbal - Ficus clavata000010
11OthersSimbal - Bombax malabaricum000002
12OthersDhura - Anogeissus latifolia0141000
13OthersCheela - Broad Leave020000
14OthersGawan - Broad Leave010000
Total 0 12519 05 15
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 164


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Chil Shelter wood working Circle. Sivliculture system adapted is Indian irregular shelterwood system and rotation period is 120 years.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area in question is not vulnerable to land slides
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.5
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The Wild Life present in the area are porcupines, Monkeys, Langoors, Wild Bears , etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): The area is used to dump the Solid Waste. No felli
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 5
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 0.75
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1MC DharamshalaUnknownNil
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : Yes
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 8.51094
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
115.95CFS KhanyaraD/salaP15    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Part II
2 NPV Bill
3 Reply Observations
4 Reply to the Observations
5 Penal NPV Bill

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kangra57390061061.58204.0269102401.185431/03/2021383.08140
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
D/salaD/SalaDFOYesOne15/12/2020
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
D/salaD/SalaDFO RecommendedThere is other non forest land available in the area so the construction of Solid Waste Management Plant is necessarily to be constructed on the forest land. All measures have been taken to minimize the forest land. The diversion of 2.9696 ha of forest land is recommended for the betterment of the society as it will provide long term benefits.
D/SalaCF RecommendedThe proposal is for the benefit of general public.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended15/07/2021RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data