PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-099/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Shimla  (iii) Forest Division : Rampur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.0934  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Industry
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Rampur0.062Protected Forest
2Rampur0.0314Gair Mumkin Machine
Total 0.0934
Division 1. : Rampur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Shimla0.0934
Total0.0934
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.09340Eco 5
Total. 0.0934


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Others0000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Chil working circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed site not seriously eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.00
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Monkey, Leopard, Crow, Sparrow, Lizard, snake, jungle fowl etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Distance from nearest WL sanctuary.
2 Site inspection
3 Compliance report of earlier approval granted by GOI.
4 NPV bill
5 Part-II Recommentation
6 EDS reply

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Shimla12984840372.76704.437921464.712631/03/20181660.410
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
 RampurCFNoNo Data
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
RampurRampurDFOYesOne02/11/2018
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
RampurRampurDFO RecommendedApproval for diversion of 0.2898 hec. forest land has already been accorded by the MoEF, GoI under section of FCA, 1980 for mining and establishment of stone crusher in favour of the user agency and now only 0.0934 hec. forest land is applied for renewal for establishment of stone crusher is required by the M/s Bushahr Laghu Udyog.
RampurCF RecommendedApproval for diversion of 0.2898 hac of forest land has already been accorded by the MoEF, GoI under section of FCA,1980 for mining and establishment of stone crusher in favour of the user agency and now only 0.0934 hac. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended21/02/2019 RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data