PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-0198/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Kinnaur  (iii) Forest Division : Kinnaur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.4148  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Hydel
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Kinnaur0.4148DPF-C-234 Kashang-I
Total 0.4148
Division 1. : Kinnaur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kinnaur0.4148
Total0.4148
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.41480.2Eco 6
Total. 0.4148


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Pine1700400
Total 17 00 40 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 21

(iii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersDeaodar ( Cedrus Deodara)1200400
2OthersNeoza ( Pinus Geradiana)300000
3OthersKail (Pinus Wallichania)200000
Total 17 00 40 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 21

(iv) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The proposed area falls under the Protection Working Circle of the old working plan. The working plan is under revision.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area is not seriously eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Himalayan BLack bear, Leopard, red fox etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The Representative of the State Government of Himachal Pradesh mentioned that the proposed site was 6 Km Horizontal distance from Lippa-Asrang Wildlife Sanctuary and as informed by the project proponents, the project is being taken up underground and surface activities are limited to construction phase and were of temporary in nature and that the project area is downstream to the sanctuary
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 208158
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
11.8296UF-KhawangiKalpa467/1    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 cost of trees
2 Land Suitability Certificate
3 Location
4 Abstract of Trees
5
6 Comment of Wild Life
7 Revised Site Inspection Report
8 Revised Part-II
9 NPV
10 Reply
11 Cost Norms
12 Reply Letter
13 Undertaking for No Change in Proposal
14 Reply Letter 31.03.2023
15 Reply 25.03.2023
16 Expenditure CAT Plan
17 Reply 25.03.2023
18 CAT Plan
19 Tree Enumeration list
20 Reply 21.06.2023
21 Reply With Annexure 15.02.2024
22 Reply with Annexure

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kinnaur49169.6635476.081134.4748722044.061631/03/20231787.040
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
KinnaurRampurDFOYesOne15/09/2020
 RampurCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
KinnaurRampurDFO RecommendedThe site was inspected on dated 15 08 2020 along with the user agency and it was found out that the land identified for the proposal measuring 0.4148 Ha is a part of DPF 234 Kashang and is unavoidable and is barest minimum required for the project.The additional land is required for the Silt Flushing tunnel portal and flushing tunnel.The land required is bare minimum and is recommended for the diversion.
RampurCF RecommendedThe justification has been submitted by the user agency in check list No.10 which is placed in the proposal folders Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended31/10/2022RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShimlaRegional OfficeFC/HPB/01/177/2022 01/10/2024
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/HYD/49387/2020HYD49387202015019,388,876.00Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2024-11-052024-11-16
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/HP/HYD/49387/2020Approved In-PrincipleNo Data