PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0182/2020
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Chamba
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bharmour
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
13.3082
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bharmour
13.3082
Protected Forest
Total
13.3082
Division 1. : Bharmour
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chamba
13.3082
Total
13.3082
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
13.3082
0.009
Eco 6
Total.
13.3082
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Alnus Nepalensis
Piyak
18
8
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Kail (Pinus Wallichiana )
6
9
1
1
0
0
3
Others
Liyor ( Juniperus Indica)
0
1
2
0
0
0
4
Pinus Griffithi Michell
Chilgoza ( Pyrus Pashia)
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Chill ( Pinus Roxburghil)
2
3
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Ban ( Quircus Dilatata)
12
0
0
0
0
0
7
Ailanthus excelsa
Alienthus
0
2
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Kahu ( Oliapherugenia)
1
2
0
0
0
0
Total
39
26
3
1
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
69
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Land falls under PWC as per working plan prescription of Sh. Avtar Sing IFS .
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area along the proposed project alignment has stable strata is not vulnerable to soil erosion. .
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.5
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
The Proposed forest land does not form the part of wild life sanctuary/ National Park. But it falls within 10 Kms distance from the boundary of Tundah Wild Life Sanctuary. So Comments of Chief Warden Wild Life is annexed at page 139-140 in the proposal folder.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The Proposed forest land does not form the part of wild life sanctuary/ National Park. But it falls within 10 Kms distance from the boundary of Tundah Wild Life Sanctuary. So Comments of Chief Warden Wild Life is annexed at page 139-140 in the proposal folder.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
9182836
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
13.00
Dughilang-III
Bhutti
52H/4
View file
2
2
10
Mangarh-III
Bhutti
52D/16
View file
3
3
3.62
Mangarh-III
Bhutti
53E/1
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
List of Trees
2
Wild Life Sanctuary/Eco Sensitive Zone Certificate
3
Revised NPV Bill.
4
Muck Dumping Trees List
5
Ropeway Trees List and Under Taking Not Felled.
6
Trees list & Undertaking
7
Revised Ca Scheme Tundah
8
Cost of Trees & Abstract
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chamba
6528
453756
357.832
34
735.832
31/03/2020
642.56
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bharmour
Chamba
DFO
Yes
One
27/11/2020
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bharmour
Chamba
DFO
Recommended
The entire alternative for the purpose have been explored and the demand for required are i.e. 13.3082 hac. is minimum demand for forest land. Hence recommended.
Chamba
CF
Recommended
Recommended as per the reports DFO Bharmour and User Agency.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
23/08/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×