PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0145/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Shimla
(iii)
Forest Division :
Rampur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
7.4268
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Rampur
5.5995
Protected Forest
2
Rampur
1.8273
Unclassed Forests
Total
7.4268
Division 1. : Rampur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Shimla
7.4268
Total
7.4268
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
7.4268
0.4
Eco 6
Total.
7.4268
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Kail (Pinus Waliachiana)
0
4
1
0
0
0
2
Others
Deodar (Cedrus Deodara)
17
11
3
0
0
0
3
Others
Rai (Picia Smithiana)
8
6
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Tosh (Abies pindrow)
2
2
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Walnut (Juglans regia)
4
3
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Mohru (Quercus Dilatata)
2
9
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Maple (Other Broad Leaves)
3
0
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Fir (Picia Smithiana)
3
10
0
0
0
0
9
Others
Kharshu (Quercus Semicarpifolia)
8
7
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Other Broad Leaves
74
21
0
0
0
0
Total
121
73
4
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
198
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area falls under Deo/kail Working circle PB-IV & I and Chil Working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not seriously eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.500
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wolf (Canis pallips), India Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Indian porcupine (Hystrix indica), Brown flying squirrel (Peeromys petaurista), Monkey (Macac malatta), Jackal (Canis aureus), Hill mouse (Mos homourus), Cheer pheasant (Catreus wallichii), Chakor partridge (Alectoris graeca) & House crow (Corvus splendens)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
3937358
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
2
5
UF Doi
Nankhari
53E/11
View file
2
3
5
UF Doi
Nankhari
53E/11
View file
3
1
5
UF Nirath
Nankhari
53E/11
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Details of funds utilized under different CAT plan under Rampur Forest Division
2
Revised NPV
3
Revised Part-II
4
Land suitability certificate
5
Revised Site Inspection Report
6
minimum use of forest land
7
Revised cost of trees attached.
8
Justification
9
CA undertaking
10
NPV undertaking
11
CA land bank certificate
12
FRA undertaking
13
Joint inspection report
14
Addl. NPV undertaking
15
Govt. land statement
16
CA scheme
17
Revised enumeration of trees list
18
Revised cost of trees
19
Check list 20 Land suitability certificate
20
Check List 17 Location map of CA site
21
CA Certificate by DFO
22
Revised cost of Trees attached.
23
EDS reply 09.12.2024
24
EDS attached
25
Trees enumeration list attached.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Shimla
129848
39420.92
705.7867
93
1467.412
31/03/2019
1660.41
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Yes
One
14/12/2019
Rampur
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Rampur
Rampur
DFO
Recommended
The case is recommended.
Rampur
CF
Recommended
The case is recommended for approval as per justification shown in check list No.4
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
10/06/2020
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×