PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0128/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Chamba
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bharmour
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
3.7463
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bharmour
3.7463
DPF
Total
3.7463
Division 1. : Bharmour
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chamba
3.7463
Total
3.7463
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.7463
0.02
Eco 6
Total.
3.7463
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Kail (PINUS WALLICHIANA)
30
3
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Deodar (CEDRUS DEODARA)
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Fir (ABIES PINDROW)
2
1
2
0
0
0
4
Others
Ban (QUERCUS DILITATA)
4
3
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Khadak (CELTIS AUSTRALIS)
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Piak ( ALNUS NEPALENSIS)
7
3
0
0
0
0
Total
44
11
2
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
57
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Land falls under Plantation Working Circle and as for working plan prescription of Sh. Avtar Singh IFS.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land proposed for diversion in not vulnerable to soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.5
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Ghoral, Black Bear, Fox, Langur, Crow wildlife present in and around the forest land does not from the part of wildlife sanctuary/ National Park. But it falls within aerial distance from the boundary of Tundah wildlife sanctuary. So comments of D.F.O. Wildlife Chamba is enclosed at page 63.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
3411756
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
4.81
Kuthar DPF
Swai (Garola)
52D/6/SE
View file
2
2
3.43
Kuthar DPF
Swai (Garola)
52D/6/SE
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
All part II PDF
2
Wild Life Certificate
3
Revised Part-II
4
revised NPV
5
Reply EDs raised by Nodal Officer Cum-PCCF (FCA) Letter No. 48-5745/2022 FCA dated 26.05.2026.
6
Documentary Proof for CA
7
Reply ( In response to point no. 14 documentary proof of Proposed CA site be uploaded,)
8
Reply with all doc
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chamba
652200
453756
495.9414
41
991.8828
31/03/2025
830
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bharmour
Chamba
DFO
Yes
One
24/06/2022
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bharmour
Chamba
DFO
Recommended
The entire alternative for the purpose have been explored and the demand for required are i.e. 3.7463 hac. is minimum demand for forest land. Hence recommended.
Chamba
CF
Recommended
Recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
18/08/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×