PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0334/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Kullu
(iii)
Forest Division :
GHNP
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.8223
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
GHNP
0.8223
Protected Forest
Total
0.8223
Division 1. : GHNP
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Kullu
0.8223
Total
0.8223
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.8223
0.1003
Eco 6
Total.
0.8223
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Chil ( Pinus roxburghli)
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Ban (Quercus leucotrichophora)
4
2
1
0
0
0
3
Rhododendron
Buransh (Rhododandron arboretum)
5
1
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Pazza (prunus cerusus)
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Charakh (Alder Spp.)
2
2
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Bhashal (Salix Spp.)
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Dodhar (Ficus Palmata)
7
2
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Mandharu (Cassia fisleta)
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
Others
Titra (Rhus punjabensis)
3
0
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Kachhan ( Cornus capitata)
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
Others
Maaran (Alder Spp.)
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Chimu (Morus alwa)
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Others
kosh (Alnus nidita)
7
2
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Khadak ( Celtic austrails)
4
1
0
0
0
0
Total
36
14
1
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
51
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
No working plan prescription in GHNP Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
There is no possibility of erosion of forest land by the construction of proposed project.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
some wild animlas found in the area are crow, pigeon, sparrow, kalij phesant, common leopard etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
409320
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
1.70
PF
WL Jiwanal
53E/5
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Abstract of enumeration list
2
comments of CWLW
3
Dumentry proof of CA land
4
Bill for Reclamation Plan
5
NPV
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Kullu
550300
197629
83.8893
11
167.7786
17/12/2021
169.77
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
GHNP
GHNP
DFO
Yes
One
15/12/2021
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
GHNP
GHNP
DFO
Recommended
The required forest land is unavoidable and barest minimum requirement of the project.
GHNP
CF
Recommended
No specific reasons. Proposal may be accepted keeping in view DCF recommendations.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
04/08/2022
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Regional Office
FC/HPB/01/104/2022
30/01/2025
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/HYD/147118/2021
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×