PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-043/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Mandi
(iii)
Forest Division :
J/Nagar
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
12.4332
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
J/Nagar
6.0998
Protected Forest
2
J/Nagar
6.3334
Unclassed Forests
Total
12.4332
Division 1. : J/Nagar
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mandi
12.4332
Total
12.4332
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
12.4332
0.1
Eco 6
Total.
12.4332
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Abies Alba
Rai
0
56
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Devdar
0
7
10
0
0
0
3
Pine
Kail
0
162
2
0
0
0
4
Others
Bhayiar
0
97
1
0
0
0
5
Rhododendron
Red Buransh
0
45
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Charkha
0
23
1
0
0
0
7
Others
Akhnor(Asculus indica)
0
3
2
1
0
0
8
Others
Jamu( Prunus cornuta)
0
22
0
0
0
0
9
Others
Durpa
0
4
0
0
0
0
10
Rhus Spp.
Rikhal
0
4
1
0
0
0
11
Others
Panga
0
71
3
0
0
0
12
Others
Kathi
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Ban
0
26
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Samshaj
0
18
0
0
0
0
15
Others
Robinia
0
2
0
0
0
0
16
Juglans regia
Akhrot
0
2
0
0
0
0
17
Poplus
Poplar
0
1
1
1
0
0
18
Others
Willow(Salix denticulata )
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
0
545
21
2
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
568
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
out of the required area, 6.0998 ha area comes under protection cum rehabilitation working circle and as per working plan area needs to be preserve and protect forest from denudation and erosion and species which are best suited for the areas concerned and according to vthe natural trend of vetation are to be planted.And balance 6.3334 ha is unclassified forest and there is no any prescription in the working plan .
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Area is not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.2
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Rhesus monkey, red jungle fowl
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Mandi
66639.51
19830.69
110.5997
47
235.4944
30/08/2016
202.462
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
J/Nagar
Mandi
DFO
Yes
One
03/08/2016
Mandi
CF
Yes
One
20/10/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
J/Nagar
Mandi
DFO
Recommended
The proposed area is unavoidable and barest minimum,since the land is required for development works,so case is recommended
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Mandi
CF
Recommended
Proposed land is required for developmental activity and is bare minimum hence recommended.
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin mod angst
quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
30/03/2017
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Regional Office
8B/HP/01/39/2017/FC
14/02/2019
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/HYD/13963/2015
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×