PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : GJ-0221/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Gujarat
 (i) State / Union Territory : Gujarat  (ii) District : Banaskantha  (iii) Forest Division : Banaskantha,Banaskantha SF  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.052375  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Banaskantha3.4202Reserved Forest
2Banaskantha SF1.6321Protected Forest
Total 5.0523
Division 1. : Banaskantha
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Banaskantha3.4202
Total3.4202
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
13.42020.1Eco 3
21.63210.1Eco 3
Total. 5.0523


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Ficus RacemosaANGORA001000
2Terminalia ArjunaARJUN SADAD051311
3OthersAMALA000100
4Acacia leucophloeaANIYAR020100
5Terminalia BellaricaBAHEDA010000
6Aegle MarmelosBILI040000
7OthersBOR3114100
8Acacia NiloticaDESI BAVAL012110
9OthersDHAV DHOLO200000
10Wrigtria TingtoriaDUDHI588220
11Prosophis JulifloraGANDO BAVAL165816221
12Cassia FistulaGARAMALO030000
13OthersGOLAR122241
14Acacia NiloticaISRAEL BAVAL931331220
15Wrigtria TingtoriaINDRAVAV690000
16OthersKADO850000
17OthersKALAM030000
18Holoptelia integrifoliaKANJI124000
19OthersKANTHI233200
20OthersKARMADI000100
21OthersKARNJ030000
22Cassia SiameaKASID215362230
23OthersKUSUM004111
24OthersKHAJUR001110
25Butea MonospermaKHAKHARO067110
26Tamarindus IndicaKHATI AMALI010000
27OthersKHER010000
28Azadirachta IndicaLIMADO001010
29OthersPAHI001000
30Ficus ReligiosaPIPALO001001
31Boswellia SerrataSALAI000023
32Bombax CeibaSIMALO001011
33OthersSU-BAVAL010000
34OthersTIMARU112711541
35OthersTRABTH320000
36Ficus RacemosaUMBIYO211010
37Ficus BengalensisVAD000011
Total 71 205138 5828 11
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 511


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The track is flair with less fertile soils. The proposed projects will not affect the inexorability of the area.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Sloth Bear, Leopard
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The Road is already existing therefore no new impact is envisaged.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The Road is already existing therefore no new impact is envisaged.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1BanaskanthaJadiyal3.420288 pt
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 CA SCHEME
Division 2. : Banaskantha SF
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Banaskantha1.6321
Total1.6321
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.63210.1Eco 3
Total. 1.6321


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Cassia SiameaKashid012520
2Diasporus MelanoxylonTiimru000010
3Prosophis JulifloraGando Baval183000
4OthersIsarail Baval010000
5Wrigtria TingtoriaDudhi000010
6Ficus benghalensisVad000010
7Holoptelia integrifoliaKanji000001
Total 1 105 55 1
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 27


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : No
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : 0.00 km away from Balaram Ambaji wildlife sanctuary.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1BanaskanthaJadiyal3.420288 pt
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
Patch Wise Details
S.no Division Name Patch No. Area(in ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeVillage NameSurvey No.Compartment No./any identification No. KML file of patch
1Banaskantha14RFDanta WestNavavas183 pt0
(i). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (ii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Total Financial Outlay for C.A: 23.26
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Banaskantha10400101003471274.13436189031/01/2024012.5
2Banaskantha1074300110725.507439513.0797151.861831/03/2023151.8618518.5982
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
BanaskanthaGandhinagarWL CircleDFOYesOne05/02/2024
Banaskantha SFMehsana SF CircleDFOYesOne20/02/2024
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
BanaskanthaGandhinagarWL CircleDFO RecommendedRecommended for 3.4202 ha area
Banaskantha SFMehsana SF CircleDFO RecommendedThe requirement of forest land by user agency in proposal is unavoidable and found minimum for such project.
GandhinagarWL CircleCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Mehsana SF CircleCF RecommendedThe requirement of forest land by user agency in proposal is unavoidable and found minimum for such project. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommendation
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
GujaratState SecretaryRecommended03/07/2024Send to IRO for ApprovalState Govt. OfficerNo Data