PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
GJ-0221/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Gujarat
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Gujarat
(ii)
District :
Banaskantha
(iii)
Forest Division :
Banaskantha,Banaskantha SF
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
5.052375
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Banaskantha
3.4202
Reserved Forest
2
Banaskantha SF
1.6321
Protected Forest
Total
5.0523
Division 1. : Banaskantha
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Banaskantha
3.4202
Total
3.4202
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.4202
0.1
Eco 3
2
1.6321
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
5.0523
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Ficus Racemosa
ANGORA
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
Terminalia Arjuna
ARJUN SADAD
0
5
1
3
1
1
3
Others
AMALA
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
Acacia leucophloea
ANIYAR
0
2
0
1
0
0
5
Terminalia Bellarica
BAHEDA
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
Aegle Marmelos
BILI
0
4
0
0
0
0
7
Others
BOR
3
11
4
1
0
0
8
Acacia Nilotica
DESI BAVAL
0
1
2
1
1
0
9
Others
DHAV DHOLO
2
0
0
0
0
0
10
Wrigtria Tingtoria
DUDHI
5
8
8
2
2
0
11
Prosophis Juliflora
GANDO BAVAL
16
58
16
2
2
1
12
Cassia Fistula
GARAMALO
0
3
0
0
0
0
13
Others
GOLAR
1
2
2
2
4
1
14
Acacia Nilotica
ISRAEL BAVAL
9
31
33
12
2
0
15
Wrigtria Tingtoria
INDRAVAV
6
9
0
0
0
0
16
Others
KADO
8
5
0
0
0
0
17
Others
KALAM
0
3
0
0
0
0
18
Holoptelia integrifolia
KANJI
1
2
4
0
0
0
19
Others
KANTHI
2
3
3
2
0
0
20
Others
KARMADI
0
0
0
1
0
0
21
Others
KARNJ
0
3
0
0
0
0
22
Cassia Siamea
KASID
2
15
36
22
3
0
23
Others
KUSUM
0
0
4
1
1
1
24
Others
KHAJUR
0
0
1
1
1
0
25
Butea Monosperma
KHAKHARO
0
6
7
1
1
0
26
Tamarindus Indica
KHATI AMALI
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
Others
KHER
0
1
0
0
0
0
28
Azadirachta Indica
LIMADO
0
0
1
0
1
0
29
Others
PAHI
0
0
1
0
0
0
30
Ficus Religiosa
PIPALO
0
0
1
0
0
1
31
Boswellia Serrata
SALAI
0
0
0
0
2
3
32
Bombax Ceiba
SIMALO
0
0
1
0
1
1
33
Others
SU-BAVAL
0
1
0
0
0
0
34
Others
TIMARU
11
27
11
5
4
1
35
Others
TRABTH
3
2
0
0
0
0
36
Ficus Racemosa
UMBIYO
2
1
1
0
1
0
37
Ficus Bengalensis
VAD
0
0
0
0
1
1
Total
71
205
138
58
28
11
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
511
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The track is flair with less fertile soils. The proposed projects will not affect the inexorability of the area.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Sloth Bear, Leopard
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The Road is already existing therefore no new impact is envisaged.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
The Road is already existing therefore no new impact is envisaged.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Banaskantha
Jadiyal
3.4202
88 pt
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
CA SCHEME
Division 2. : Banaskantha SF
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Banaskantha
1.6321
Total
1.6321
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.6321
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
1.6321
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Cassia Siamea
Kashid
0
1
2
5
2
0
2
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tiimru
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
Prosophis Juliflora
Gando Baval
1
8
3
0
0
0
4
Others
Isarail Baval
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Wrigtria Tingtoria
Dudhi
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
Ficus benghalensis
Vad
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
Holoptelia integrifolia
Kanji
0
0
0
0
0
1
Total
1
10
5
5
5
1
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
27
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
0.00 km away from Balaram Ambaji wildlife sanctuary.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Banaskantha
Jadiyal
3.4202
88 pt
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Division Name
Patch No.
Area(in ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Village Name
Survey No.
Compartment No./any identification No.
KML file of patch
1
Banaskantha
1
4
RF
Danta West
Navavas
183 pt
0
(i).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(ii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
div>
(iv).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A:
23.26
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Banaskantha
1040010
100347
1274.13436
189
0
31/01/2024
0
12.5
2
Banaskantha
1074300
110725.5074
39
513.0797
151.8618
31/03/2023
151.8618
518.5982
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Banaskantha
GandhinagarWL Circle
DFO
Yes
One
05/02/2024
Banaskantha SF
Mehsana SF Circle
DFO
Yes
One
20/02/2024
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Banaskantha
GandhinagarWL Circle
DFO
Recommended
Recommended for 3.4202 ha area
Banaskantha SF
Mehsana SF Circle
DFO
Recommended
The requirement of forest land by user agency in proposal is unavoidable and found minimum for such project.
GandhinagarWL Circle
CF
Recommended
Recommended
Yes
Mehsana SF Circle
CF
Recommended
The requirement of forest land by user agency in proposal is unavoidable and found minimum for such project.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommendation
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Gujarat
State Secretary
Recommended
03/07/2024
Send to IRO for Approval
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×