PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : GJ-028/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Gujarat
 (i) State / Union Territory : Gujarat  (ii) District : kutch  (iii) Forest Division : Kutch-West  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 9.7503  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Kutch-West9.7503Reserved Forest
Total 9.7503
Division 1. : Kutch-West
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1kutch9.7503
Total9.7503
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
19.75030.6Eco 4
Total. 9.7503


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Azadirachta IndicaLimdo015021
2OthersBoradi0141000
3Prasophis sinereriaKhijdo345100000
4OthersVingo085000
5OthersKed0130000
6Prosophis JulifloraGando Baval57525933010
7OthersGorad011113000
8Acacia AuriculiformisAngoriyo14213000
9OthersDumro051000
10OthersTankaro18249000
11OthersLiyar62739020
12OthersIzrayil Baval052000
13OthersKejaliyu010000
14Holoptelia integrifoliaKanji2000010
15OthersGangeti1000000
16OthersAapto011000
17OthersRagatroyado0000021
Total 619 535212 08 2
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 1376


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : As user agency will use land for landscaping, heavy tree plantation will be done. So, no significant erosion will happened
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 00
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): Cunstruction of building, solar plant, road
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 2011
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 0.45
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Shri Anil Ajitprasad JainAdministrator of Veerayatan at Veerayatan Jakhaniya Bhuj Mandvi road KachchhFOR No. 05/2016-17, 1/2018-19 & 5/2020-21 Mandvi Range has been booked against company and Rs. 48,000 + 25,000 + 15,000 + 50,000 = Rs.1,38,000/- has been- recovered as deposit for Violation / damaging the Forest. Further inquiry has been in progress.
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1kutchGajansar5.2178Revenue S.No. 205, 206
2kutchKhanay4.5325Revenue S. No 27, 28
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1kutch4565200218602.92230.87711860.4802/02/2021702.1018721.87
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Kutch-WestKutch CircleDFOYesOne01/02/2021
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Kutch-WestKutch CircleDFO Recommended For Educational purposes As per detail note on Project Anne. 04 User agency has occupied surround private survey No.543, 549, 560 and survey No.557, 558, 562, 534, 539, 540, 541 are under the ownership of the user agency. So has there is no scope of alternative land for the development. User agency are recommended not to cut local tree species mentioned in marking kharda Annexure 16 . Only prosopis juliflora will be removed. User agency has repeatedly violated forest Conservation act 1980. So, penalty should be kept 5 times of actual.
Kutch CircleCF Recommended RecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended