PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
GJ-028/2020
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Gujarat
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Gujarat
(ii)
District :
kutch
(iii)
Forest Division :
Kutch-West
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
9.7503
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Kutch-West
9.7503
Reserved Forest
Total
9.7503
Division 1. : Kutch-West
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
kutch
9.7503
Total
9.7503
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
9.7503
0.6
Eco 4
Total.
9.7503
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Azadirachta Indica
Limdo
0
1
5
0
2
1
2
Others
Boradi
0
14
1
0
0
0
3
Prasophis sinereria
Khijdo
3
45
100
0
0
0
4
Others
Vingo
0
8
5
0
0
0
5
Others
Ked
0
13
0
0
0
0
6
Prosophis Juliflora
Gando Baval
575
259
33
0
1
0
7
Others
Gorad
0
111
13
0
0
0
8
Acacia Auriculiformis
Angoriyo
14
21
3
0
0
0
9
Others
Dumro
0
5
1
0
0
0
10
Others
Tankaro
18
24
9
0
0
0
11
Others
Liyar
6
27
39
0
2
0
12
Others
Izrayil Baval
0
5
2
0
0
0
13
Others
Kejaliyu
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
Holoptelia integrifolia
Kanji
2
00
0
0
1
0
15
Others
Gangeti
1
00
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Aapto
0
1
1
0
0
0
17
Others
Ragatroyado
0
00
0
0
2
1
Total
619
535
212
0
8
2
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1376
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
As user agency will use land for landscaping, heavy tree plantation will be done. So, no significant erosion will happened
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Cunstruction of building, solar plant, road
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2011
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.45
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Shri Anil Ajitprasad Jain
Administrator of Veerayatan at Veerayatan Jakhaniya Bhuj Mandvi road Kachchh
FOR No. 05/2016-17, 1/2018-19 & 5/2020-21 Mandvi Range has been booked against company and Rs. 48,000 + 25,000 + 15,000 + 50,000 = Rs.1,38,000/- has been- recovered as deposit for Violation / damaging the Forest. Further inquiry has been in progress.
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
kutch
Gajansar
5.2178
Revenue S.No. 205, 206
2
kutch
Khanay
4.5325
Revenue S. No 27, 28
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
kutch
4565200
218602.92
230.877
11
860.48
02/02/2021
702.10
18721.87
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Kutch-West
Kutch Circle
DFO
Yes
One
01/02/2021
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Kutch-West
Kutch Circle
DFO
Recommended
For Educational purposes As per detail note on Project Anne. 04 User agency has occupied surround private survey No.543, 549, 560 and survey No.557, 558, 562, 534, 539, 540, 541 are under the ownership of the user agency. So has there is no scope of alternative land for the development. User agency are recommended not to cut local tree species mentioned in marking kharda Annexure 16 . Only prosopis juliflora will be removed. User agency has repeatedly violated forest Conservation act 1980. So, penalty should be kept 5 times of actual.
Kutch Circle
CF
Recommended
Recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×