PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
GA-03/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Goa
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Goa
(ii)
District :
South Goa
(iii)
Forest Division :
South
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.6156
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
South
0.6156
Proposed Reserved Forests (Sec-4 of IFA)
Total
0.6156
Division 1. : South
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
South Goa
0.6156
Total
0.6156
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.6156
0.6
Eco 2
Total.
0.6156
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Auriculiformis
Accacia
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
Misc. Species
Nawati
0
24
10
1
0
0
3
Misc. Species
Char
0
2
2
1
0
0
4
Terminalia Paniculata
Kindal
0
8
4
2
1
0
5
Terminalia bellerica
Ghotting
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
Misc. Species
Kumbyo
0
2
1
1
0
0
7
Terminalia Tomentosa
Madat
0
7
2
0
0
0
8
Anacardium Occidentale
Cashew
1
12
7
0
0
0
9
Garcinia Indica
Bhirand
0
0
0
1
0
0
10
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asan
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Tectona Grandis
Teak
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Artocarpus Hirsuta
Pat Panas
0
1
2
0
0
0
13
Misc. Species
Karmal
0
1
1
0
1
1
14
Misc. Species
Tripola
0
0
1
0
0
0
15
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Panas
0
0
2
0
0
0
16
Adina cordifolia
Hedu
0
2
1
0
0
2
17
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
2
0
0
0
18
Semecarpus Anacardium
bibo
0
13
17
8
4
0
19
Anthocephalus Cadamba
Odom
0
0
0
0
2
0
20
Misc. Species
Rumod
0
2
0
0
0
0
21
Bombax Ceiba
Sawar
0
0
1
1
1
0
22
Misc. Species
Moi
0
3
1
0
0
0
23
Misc. Species
Kudo
0
1
0
0
0
0
24
Misc. Species
Karo
0
1
0
0
0
0
25
Syzigium Cumini
Jambul
0
2
1
0
0
0
26
Lagistromia Lanceolata
Nano
0
0
0
1
0
0
27
Misc. Species
Kharsang
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
Misc. Species
Katkawach
0
1
2
0
0
0
29
Misc. Species
Kassam
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
1
86
57
19
11
4
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
178
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Not Vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wild Boar, Monkeys, etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
illegal clearing, felling, excavation leveling for
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2018
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.2272
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Shri Rajesh K.,
P.W.D. Contractor, r/o, 17/194, Lake house, Ganesh Nagar, Mannipady, P.O. Ramdas Nagar, Kudlu Kasaragod, Kerala-671124
The Range Forest Officer, Pissonem vide R.O.C. No.12/PRO/2018-19 and R.O.C. No.13/PRO/2018-19 dated 30.11.2018 has registered an offence for illegal clearing, felling, excavation leveling for road construction in survey No.19 of Cola village of Canacona Taluka damaged area 1312 Sq.mts and survey No.29 of Quedem village of Quepem Taluka damaged area 960 Sq.mts. (1312 + 960 = 2272 Sq.mts.)
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
South Goa
1966
576.04
801.6180
44
2085.8744
1013.8600
945.719
68.341
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
South
Conservation
DFO
Yes
Two
19/02/2019,23/04/2019
Conservation
CF
Yes
One
21/08/2019
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
South
Conservation
DFO
Recommended
Since the project has significant relevance for development and being Government project for public purposes the proposal is recommended.
Conservation
CF
Recommended
Considering the requirement of the locals and its relevance for overall development of the area the case is recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The proposal is recommended in public interest
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Goa
State Secretary
Recommended
24/01/2020
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Bangalore
Regional Office
F.No.4-GOB1226/2020-BAN/
16/04/2021
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/GA/ROAD/38802/2019
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×