PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : AP-061/2017
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh  (ii) District : Cuddapah  (iii) Forest Division : WL Rajampet  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 1.77  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1WL Rajampet1.77Reserved Forest
Total 1.77
Division 1. : WL Rajampet
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Cuddapah1.77
Total1.77
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.770.1Eco 3
Total. 1.77


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Cassia FistulaRela080000
2Wrigtria TingtoriaReppala0130000
3Acacia CatechuSandra012110010
Total 0 14210 01 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 153


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Protection Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed Forest area for diversion is not vulnerable for erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Rabbits,Cats etc.,
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1CuddapahBaggidipalli4.12Sy.No.707
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1
2
3
4
5
6 There is alternative Road connectivity for the Yakaropalli Village people to the nearby village i.e., Baggidipalli since the inception of the village. Hence the recommended for this proposals.

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Cuddapah359289122883.3755.795477.7331/01/201871.92492.68
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
WL RajampetWLM - TirupathiDFOYesOne03/02/2018
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
WL RajampetWLM - TirupathiDFO RecommendedThere is no alternative road connectivity for the Yakiropalli Village people to the nearby village i.e., Baggidipalli since the inception of the village. Hence recommended for this proposal
WLM - TirupathiCF RecommendedDiversion of 1.77 Ha. is unavoidable to provide connectivity to VillagersYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Andhra PradeshState SecretaryRecommended25/04/2018Recommende State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
VijayawadaRegional Office4-APB058/2018-CHN10/05/2018
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/AP/ROAD/30927/2017Approved In-PrincipleNo Data