PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : AP-022/2016
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh  (ii) District : Kurnool  (iii) Forest Division : Atmakur (WLM)  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.03  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Atmakur (WLM)2.03Reserved Forest
Total 2.03
Division 1. : Atmakur (WLM)
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kurnool2.03
Total2.03
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
12.030.3Eco 3
Total. 2.03


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The proposed road is passing through Compartment No. 775 of Guvvalakuntla-A RF and the said compartment is proposed under Conservation Working Circle of Atmakur Wildlife Management Division with the following prescription. (i)The main focus will be protection from encroachment and illegal fishing. (ii)Protection from Fire, Grazing and Illicit fellings. (iii)Soil and moisture conservation works, like Check Dams, Percolation Tanks, Contour Trenches, Gully plugging etc., are to be created in the areas away from the submergible part. (iv)Removal of multiple coppice shoots of useful species and singling them out.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The slope of the proposed area is moderate to steep and it is amenable for erosion and the left side of the proposed road comes under back water of river Krishna
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The wildlife present in and around the forest land is Spotted Deer, Wild boar, Peacock etc.,
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): A case was booked against the Contractors and Panc
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : NIL
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 0.462
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
11)Ranga Siva Kesava RedySub ContractorCase has been Booked under Trial
22)M.Madhava ReddyExecutive Engineer Case has been Booked and Acquitted
33)D. RamachandaraiahAssistant Engineer Case has been Booked and Acquitted
44)S.C.VenkateswarluDy.Executive EngineerCase has been Booked and Acquitted
55)M/s Manohar Reddy & BrothersContractorsCase has been Booked under Trial
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Violation Brief Note details
2 Tree Enumeration Certificate

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kurnool17658003482653643.307031/03/20160648.52
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Atmakur (WLM)FDPT -  SrisailamDFOYesOne01/07/2016
 FDPT -  SrisailamCFYesOne01/07/2016
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Atmakur (WLM)FDPT -  SrisailamDFO RecommendedRecommended
FDPT -  SrisailamCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Andhra PradeshState SecretaryRecommended19/09/2016approval orders issued State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
VijayawadaState Government3879/ Section-II/201622/07/2016
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/AP/ROAD/19037/2016IN-PRINCIPLENo Data