PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
AP-018/2020
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Andhra Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Andhra Pradesh
(ii)
District :
East Godavari
(iii)
Forest Division :
Kakinada
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
9.74
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Quarrying
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Kakinada
9.74
Section 16
Total
9.74
Division 1. : Kakinada
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
East Godavari
9.74
Total
9.74
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
9.74
0.5
Eco 3
Total.
9.74
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Misc. Species
Alli
0
1
2
0
0
0
2
Misc. Species
Anem
0
0
0
4
0
0
3
Wrigtria Tingtoria
Ankudu
3
43
12
3
0
0
4
Erythrina Indica
Baditha
0
0
1
6
0
0
5
Adina cordifolia
Bandaru
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
Billudu
Ximenia americana
0
33
18
0
0
0
7
Bombax Ceiba
Buruga
0
0
0
2
0
0
8
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Chennangi
0
35
24
5
0
0
9
Pterospermum Acerifolia
Chilaka duddiga
0
28
1
1
0
0
10
Misc. Species
Chirumanu
0
9
16
18
0
0
11
Pterospermum Acerifolia
Dudduga
0
10
3
0
0
0
12
Thespesia Populenea
Gangaravi
0
0
0
3
0
0
13
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Gatha
0
12
3
1
0
0
14
Misc. Species
Guggilam
0
1
1
2
0
0
15
Gmelina Arborea
Gummadi
0
0
1
0
0
0
16
Misc. Species
Gumpena
0
3
11
8
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Induga
0
19
19
11
0
0
18
Prosophis Spicigera
Jammi
0
0
1
1
0
0
19
Jeelugu
acschynomene aspera
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
Xylia Xylocarpa
Thangedu
2
165
123
35
0
0
21
Terminalia Chebula
Karaka
0
22
7
1
0
0
22
Misc. Species
KOndagogu
0
0
1
4
0
0
23
Thapasi
Sterulia villosa
0
2
6
8
0
0
24
Misc. Species
Kummi
0
6
28
21
0
0
25
Misc. Species
Loluga
0
107
20
3
0
0
26
Aegle Marmelos
Maredu
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
Misc. Species
Mushini
0
44
34
20
0
0
28
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Nalla gatha
0
12
6
0
0
0
29
Terminalia Tomentosa
Nalla maddi
1
25
10
0
0
0
30
Acacia Nilotica
Nalla tumma
0
0
1
0
0
0
31
Semecarpus Anacardium
Nalla jeedi
0
6
1
0
0
0
32
Albezzia Amara
Nalla regu
0
3
3
2
0
0
33
Holoptelia integrifolia
Nemali
0
5
3
0
0
0
34
Syzigium Cumini
Neredu
0
11
21
61
0
0
35
Misc. Species
Pachari
0
2
2
2
0
0
36
Misc. Species
Pala
1
68
24
2
0
0
37
Misc. Species
Pisingi
0
5
0
0
0
0
38
Misc. Species
Pisinika
0
2
0
0
0
0
39
Ficus Religiosa
Ravi
0
0
1
10
0
0
40
Cassia Fistula
Rela
2
94
0
18
0
0
41
Misc. Species
revadi
0
2
7
32
0
0
42
Misc. Species
Sandra
0
1
0
0
0
0
43
Misc. Species
Tedla pala
0
1
0
0
0
0
44
Acacia leucophloea
Tella tumma
0
1
3
3
0
0
45
Grewia Tiliaefolia
Tada
0
3
3
0
0
0
46
Terminalia Bellarica
Tani
0
12
16
12
0
0
47
Moringa oleifera
Togara
0
15
7
0
0
0
48
Misc. Species
Tummeda
0
0
1
0
0
0
49
embelica officinalis
Usiri
0
0
1
2
0
0
50
Feronia Elephantum
Velaga
0
2
0
0
0
0
51
Pterocarpus Marsupium
yegisa
0
2
2
0
0
0
52
Misc. Species
Yerra gatha
0
11
4
2
0
0
53
Misc. Species
Billudu
0
1
0
0
0
0
54
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Chennangi
0
0
2
0
0
0
55
Tamarindus indicus
chintha
0
0
0
1
0
0
56
Misc. Species
Chirumanu
0
1
0
1
0
0
57
Xylia Xylocarpa
Thangedu
0
2
3
0
0
0
58
Misc. Species
Kummi
0
0
0
1
0
0
59
Misc. Species
Mushini
0
3
1
1
0
0
60
Terminalia Tomentosa
Nalla maddi
0
1
0
0
0
0
61
Syzigium Cumini
Neredu
0
0
1
0
0
0
62
Ficus Religiosa
Ravi
0
0
0
1
0
0
63
Cassia Fistula
Rela
0
1
0
0
0
0
64
Misc. Species
Revadi
0
0
0
1
0
0
65
Terminalia Bellarica
Thani
0
0
1
2
0
0
66
Misc. Species
Vavili
0
1
0
0
0
0
67
Misc. Species
Yerra gatha
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
9
836
457
311
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1613
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Taken care in the project cost.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
The proposed Mining area is in the Sarlanka Reserv
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Fox, Hare, Wildbore, Chousinga, Porcupine and Deer is there in Sarlanka RF area
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Anantapur
Peddannavaripalli
2.48
Sy.no.226/2
2
Anantapur
Peddannavaripalli
2.88
Sy.no.206//1
3
Anantapur
vodulaipalli
2.29
Sy.no.125/1
4
Anantapur
Nuthanakaluva
2.02
Sy.no.90-2
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
2
3
4
The proposed diversion of forest area will not have adverse impact on fauna in view of the wildlife conservation measurements and habitat improvement works proposed to be taken up. The safety measures will protect the sloppy areas. In view of the above this project proposals are RECOMMENDED subject to fulfillment of the conditions by the user agency
5
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
East Godavari
301979
56407.1
127.573
6
124.32
20/04/2023
124.32
262.02
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Kakinada
Rajahmundry
DFO
Yes
One
03/04/2023
Rajahmundry
CF
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Kakinada
Rajahmundry
DFO
Recommended
The proposed diversion of forest area will not have adverse impact on the fauna in view of the wildlife conservation measurements and habitat improvement works proposed to be taken up. The safety measures proposed will protect the sloppy areas. In view of the above this project proposals are RECOMMENDED, subject to fulfillment of the conditions by the user agency
Rajahmundry
CF
Recommended
No other sources available as per the information available in the proposals.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Part IV recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Andhra Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
05/09/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×