PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : AP-042/2021
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh  (ii) District : Guntur  (iii) Forest Division : Markapur (WLM)  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 19.13  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Pipeline
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Markapur (WLM)19.13Reserved Forest
Total 19.13
Division 1. : Markapur (WLM)
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Guntur19.13
Total19.13
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
119.130.2Eco 3
Total. 19.13


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Ziayphus xylopyraGotti13250000
2Butea MonospermaModuga010000
3Hardwickia BinnataYepi00359195590
4Albezzia AmaraNarlinga372601000
5Aegle MarmelosMaredu010000
6Cassia FistulaRela030000
7Terminalia bellericaTani007000
8Pterocarpus MarsupiumYegisa005000
9Azadirachta IndicaVepa003000
10OthersAare160100
11OthersBilludu5603432000
12OthersChilla260000
13OthersChirumanu1002250000
14OthersJana655982000
15OthersJuvvi001010
16OthersMusthi010000
17OthersNemali adugu001000
18OthersNemmi031000
19OthersOddi130000
20OthersPoliki3210020
21OthersSandra7282000
22OthersTada005040
23OthersTaluku123943200
24OthersGumpena100000
25OthersMuriki Nimma050000
26OthersKale090000
27OthersKumkudu030000
28OthersLukki040000
29OthersMunaga010000
30OthersNemali nara060000
31OthersRegu050000
32OthersTellatumma307000
33OthersVeluturu001000
34OthersNaravepi010000
35OthersPala baranki152000
Total 806 1602403 22866 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 3105


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Moderately vulnerable for erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.19
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Tiger (Panthera tigris) and Leopard (Panthera pardus) are found in the proposed area for diversion.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : As the proposed project involves pipeline construction and water pumping systems, the impact on widlife will be meagre and the proposed mitigation plan by the forest department, if implemented, will reduce the impact on wildlife.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed area for diversion is with in the limits of Rajiv Gandhi wildlife sanctuary and also part of core area of Nagarjunasagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1GunturObulesunipalli5.4894
2GunturObulesunipalli14.83916
3GunturObulesunipalli1.21917
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Guntur678513256852.172026.5657193.5812/07/2021193.581982.646
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Markapur (WLM)FDPT -  SrisailamDFOYesOne30/07/2021
 FDPT -  SrisailamCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Markapur (WLM)FDPT -  SrisailamDFO RecommendedHence, this project is recommended, taking public utility into consideration, subject to the fulfillment of the various mitigation measures proposed in the mitigation plan, at the cost of the User agency.
FDPT -  SrisailamCF RecommendedRecommended. This project is recommended, taking public utility into consideration, subject to fulfilment of the various mitigation measures proposed in the mitigation plan at the cost of User Agency.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Andhra PradeshState SecretaryRecommended07/09/2021RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
VijayawadaRegional Office4-APC133/2021-VIJ06/11/2023
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/AP/Pipeline/144181/2021Approved In-PrincipleNo Data