| Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
|
1
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
26/06/2019
|
kindly find the document attached herewith
|
|
|
2
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
22/12/2020
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
3
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
12/01/2021
|
Kindly submit the hard copies of the rectified proposal and the land details at the earliest.
|
|
|
4
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
11/11/2021
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
5
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
28/01/2022
|
The State Govt. is requested to provide following additional information for further processing of the case: -1) The State Govt may submit the report of final action on POR file and action as per para 1.21 of the F (C) Act, 1980 and Forest Conservation Rules, 2003 (Guidelines & Clarification), 2019 on the violation of Forest (C) Act, 1980 committed by the user agency. 2) NPV is to be calculated as per revised rate dated 06.01.2022. 3) Sol toposheet map to be resubmitted after duly signed by DFO concerned. 4) Distance from the nearest Protected Area. 5) Status of Forest Right Act, 2006. 6) GPS Coordinates of proposed forest land diversion, for each patch. 7) Length & Width of railway line.
|
|
|
6
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
31/01/2022
|
UA kindly provide the additional information
|
|
|
7
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Tripura South)
|
01/02/2022
|
UA kindly provide the additional information
|
|
|
8
|
CF (Tripura South)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
01/02/2022
|
UA kindly provide the additional information
|
|
|
9
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
01/02/2022
|
UA kindly provide the additional information
|
|
|
10
|
User Agency (dyceagtl@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
11/04/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
11
|
DFO (Gumti District Forest)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Tripura South)
|
11/04/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
12
|
CF (Tripura South)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/04/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
13
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
11/04/2022
|
Reply furnish against observation made by the MoEF & CC, Regional Office, Shillong.
|
|
|
14
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
11/04/2022
|
Reply furnish against observation made by the MoEF & CC, Regional Office, Shillong.
|
|
|
15
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
22/04/2022
|
I directed to inform that the additional information in respect to this instant proposal submitted by the State Govt vide letter dated 06.04.2022 has been examined. The report of the final action taken by the State Govt by simply enclosing the correspondences of DFO is not clear without any comments of the PCCF Office. Moreover, the State Govt has recommended action as per Ministry's letter No. 11-42/2017-FC dated 29.01.2018 para 3 B II, but its action on para 3B lI(iii) has not been intimated which may be submitted at the earliest. Further, the calculation of NPV as per latest order dated 06.01.2022 & 19.01.2022 may be submitted at the earliest for taking further necessary action from this e
|
|
|
16
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
04/06/2022
|
Reply furnish against observation made by the MoEF & CC, Regional Office, Shillong.
|
|
|
17
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
15/06/2022
|
I directed to inform that the additional information in respect to this instant proposal submitted by the State Govt vide letter dated 04.06.2022 has been examined. It is to be noted that this office has specifically asked for action under para 3B II(iii) of Ministry's letter No. 11-42/2017-FC dated 29.01.2018 which states: "State government will initiate disciplinary action against the official concerned for not being able to prevent use of forest land for non-forestry purpose without prior approval of the
Government of India". On the above, the State Govt is to initiate disciplinary action against the officer/staff for not being able to prevent the occurrence of offence but also failed to do so till date. Hence, the State Govt is requested to furnish action taken as per para 3B II(iii)
|
|
|
18
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
13/09/2022
|
Reply furnish against observation made by the MoEF & CC, Regional Office, Shillong.
|
|
|
19
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
14/10/2022
|
The information submitted by the State Govt vide letter dated 13.09.2022 has 'been examined in this office and it appears that the State Govt is unwilling/ incapable of taking action as per rules, which is not in tandem with laid down rules. It may be mentioned from the first EDS itself this office vide letter No. 3-TR B 001/2022- SHII2086-87 dated 28.0l.2022 has specifically requested for action to be taken as per rules 1 guidelines as the State Govt has itself recommended the proposal as per guidelines 3-B II (iii) which therefore is a case wherein violation happened after the FC proposal has been initiated. Taking cognizance of the offence's occurrence after the FC proposal has been initiated it is imperative on the State Govt's part to also take action against the officers who have fai
|
|
|
20
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
29/11/2022
|
Reply furnish against observation made by the MoEF & CC, Regional Office, Shillong.
|
|
|
21
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
11/07/2023
|
I am directed to inform that this instant proposal resubmitted along with information/clarification by the State Govt vide letter dated 25.11.2022 has been examined. It is observed from the Parivesh Portal that proposal was initiated online since 2017 (FP/TR/RAIL/25845/20 17) whereas this proposal was submitted on 04.06.2019 with inquiry conducted by DFO on 16.11.2019 and violation of FC Act observed during inspection and action was taken as per IFA by compounding the offence on the User Agency. It may also be mentioned that before submitting the proposal, the User Agency would have
had to consult and approach the Forest Department in which the local officers would have been made aware of the existence of this proposal and the area involved for which they could have been more vigilant. Mo
|
|