Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
07/07/2015
|
Shortcoming as per attachment have been noticed. Please attend to the same at the earliest.
|
|
2
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
28/07/2015
|
The Observations are attended and hard copy of the same will be submitted shortly
|
|
3
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
02/10/2015
|
EDS attached may be attended by the State Govt.
|
|
4
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/10/2015
|
EDS attached may attended by State Govt.
|
|
5
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Shimla)
|
06/10/2015
|
EDS attached may attended by State Govt.
|
|
6
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
09/10/2015
|
hortcoming as per attachment have been noticed. Please attend to the same at the earliest.
|
|
7
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
30/11/2015
|
The shortcomings are attended the hard copy of the same will be submitted very shortly.
|
|
8
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
03/12/2015
|
Shortcoming as per attachment have been noticed. Please attend to the same at the earliest as per requirement.
|
|
9
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
07/01/2016
|
Sir,
Please find the desired information. the hard copy of the same will be submitted shortly
|
|
10
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
13/01/2016
|
Please upload the scan copy of SoI Toposheet regarding area proposed for CA on its appropriate coloumn.
|
|
11
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
13/01/2016
|
Needful has been done now.
|
|
12
|
CF (Shimla)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/01/2016
|
Kindly find attached the reply of the EDS
|
|
13
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
21/01/2016
|
Reply is submitted.
|
|
14
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
21/01/2016
|
Reply is submitted.
|
|
15
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
02/02/2016
|
Following shortcomings are still not received in the proposal which may be attended by the State Govt.
1. In a reply dated 20.01.2016, uploaded online on 21.01.2016, the Digital map of the area proposed for diversion is enclosed with the hard copy of the reply but not uploaded online which may be done.
2. In the Cost Benefit analysis submitted with the reply information in column 1 of both performa VI b and VI C needs to be quantified in monetary terms. In performa VI C column 2, the figure of environmental losses mentioned in performa VI b appears to have been filled which is not correct and may be reviewed. Cost over Benefit ratio may also be worked out.
|
|
16
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
03/02/2016
|
Following shortcomings are still not received in the proposal which may be attended by the State Govt. 1. In a reply dated 20.01.2016, uploaded online on 21.01.2016, the Digital map of the area proposed for diversion is enclosed with the hard copy of the reply but not uploaded online which may be done. 2. In the Cost Benefit analysis submitted with the reply information in column 1 of both performa VI b and VI C needs to be quantified in monetary terms. In performa VI C column 2, the figure of environmental losses mentioned in performa VI b appears to have been filled which is not correct and may be reviewed. Cost over Benefit ratio may also be worked out.
|
|
17
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Shimla)
|
03/02/2016
|
Following shortcomings are still not received in the proposal which may be attended by the State Govt. 1. In a reply dated 20.01.2016, uploaded online on 21.01.2016, the Digital map of the area proposed for diversion is enclosed with the hard copy of the reply but not uploaded online which may be done. 2. In the Cost Benefit analysis submitted with the reply information in column 1 of both performa VI b and VI C needs to be quantified in monetary terms. In performa VI C column 2, the figure of environmental losses mentioned in performa VI b appears to have been filled which is not correct and may be reviewed. Cost over Benefit ratio may also be worked out.
|
|
18
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
09/02/2016
|
Shortcomings noticed as per attachment.
|
|
19
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (srmgrrohru.hpptcl@gmail.com)
|
18/04/2016
|
please address the desired shortcoming in the proposal folder
|
|
20
|
User Agency (srmgrrohru.hpptcl@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
19/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
21
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
20/04/2016
|
The Observations has been attended as per attachment
|
|
22
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
22/04/2016
|
Shortcomings noticed as per attachment.
|
|
23
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
19/05/2016
|
The shortcomings has been attended online. the hard copy of the same will be submitted by tomorrow
|
|
24
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
20/05/2016
|
Working plan prescription and density calculation is found wrong. Please recheck the same.
|
|
25
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
20/05/2016
|
Needful has done now.
|
|
26
|
CF (Shimla)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/05/2016
|
Reply of EDS is attached.
|
|
27
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Shimla)
|
24/05/2016
|
Signed copy of proposed site of Digital MAP is also required to be uploaded against the column No. 13 iii.
|
|
28
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
28/05/2016
|
Sortcomings noticed as per attachment please.
|
|
29
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (srmgrrohru.hpptcl@gmail.com)
|
31/05/2016
|
Signed copy of proposed site of Digital MAP is also required to be uploaded against the column No. 13 iii.
|
|
30
|
User Agency (srmgrrohru.hpptcl@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
31/05/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
31
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
31/05/2016
|
Needful has been done now.
|
|
32
|
CF (Shimla)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
02/06/2016
|
Needful has been done now.
|
|
33
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
16/06/2016
|
Complete reply is submitted.
|
|
34
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
16/06/2016
|
Complete reply is submitted.
|
|