Report Part-III
Form for seeking recommendation of Standing Committee of NBWL/SBWL to be filled by Wildlife Warden (Part-III)
A.
General Details
A-1.
Project Details
(i). Forest Clearance Required?:
No
(ii). Proposal No. :
FP/TG/MIN/5506/2020
(iii). Name of Project:
Cluster of Ramagundam Mines [GDK No.1&3, 2&2A and 5 Incline, GDK Coal Mine (2&2A and 5 Incline), GDK No.11 Incline, GDK No.7-LEP, Ramagundam Coal Mine (Vakilpalli Mine, Adriyala longwall Project, GDK 10&10A Inclines, RGOC-I Exp. & RGOC-II Ext.) MOCP, RGOC III Exp. Ph-II.]
(iv). Short narrative of the Project :
The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) is a Government Company, jointly owned by Government of Telangana and Government of India in 49 :51 ratio. It is the only Coal producing Company in the South India and meeting the coal requirements of various industries located in South India.
(v). State :
Telangana
(vi). Category of the Proposal :
Mining
(vii). Shape of project land :
Non Linear
(viii). Estimated cost of the Project(Rupees in lacs) :
2735.09
(ix). Total period for which clearance is required (in years):
41
(x). Category of Protected Area:
NIL
(xi). Total Project Area(in ha.):
10550
(xii). Area under Protected Area (in ha.):
3296.47
(xiii). Area under Non-Protected Area (in ha.):
7253.53
A-2.
Alternative details uploaded by User Agency
Alternative details uploaded by User Agency
No
Coal being site specific.
A-3.
Bio diversity Impact Assessment Report uploaded by User Agency
(i).Bio diversity Impact Assessment Report uploaded by User Agency:
:NA
A-4.
Details of division
Division 1. : Chennur
(i). Total Area of the Protected Area (in ha.):
13602.66
(ii). Upload copy of Conservation value of the Protected area:
Annexure Survey of India Toposheet
(iii). Comments on the proposal with reference to the alternatives considered:
There is no other alternative examined
(iv). Comments on the Bio diversity Impact Assessment Report:
Nil
Area(ha.)diverted/identified from the NP/WLS/ESZ so far for development and other purpose since it's notification:
Area(ha.)diverted/identified from the NP/WLS/ESZ so far for development and other purpose since it's notification
S.no
Name of project
User Agency
Year
Area Diverted/ Permitted for use(ha.)
1.
Nil
NA
2020
0
Impact(s)due to the diversion of area for the use of land for the projects referred above:
Impact(s)due to the diversion of area for the use of land for the projects referred above
S.no
Name of project
Upload impact report
Area Diverted / Permitted for use
1.
Nil
Annexure Upload impact report
0
Whether the project proponents have ever committed violation of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972 or Forest Conservation Act,1980:
Whether the project proponents have ever committed violation of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972 or Forest Conservation Act,1980
S.no
Under Act
Name of Project
Details of violation
Period of work done
Area of forest land involved in violation
Name of person(s) responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person(s) responsible for violation
Action taken against the person(s) responsible for violation
Any other information that you would like to place on record for decision making:
Documents
S.No
Uploaded Additional Info.
Remarks
1.
Additional Info.
PArt-III Chennur
2.
Additional Info.
SIR chennur
3.
Additional Info.
Mitigative Measures
(v). Provide comprehensive details of the likely impact of the current proposal in terms of sections 29 and/or section 35(6) of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972
:
Annexure Comprehensive letter
(vi).Has any work related to the project proposed been commenced at the proposed location
:
Yes
Division 2. : Peddapalli
(i). Total Area of the Protected Area (in ha.):
62.595
(ii). Upload copy of Conservation value of the Protected area:
Annexure Survey of India Toposheet
(iii). Comments on the proposal with reference to the alternatives considered:
No Alternatives examined
(iv). Comments on the Bio diversity Impact Assessment Report:
Not Applicable
Area(ha.)diverted/identified from the NP/WLS/ESZ so far for development and other purpose since it's notification:
Area(ha.)diverted/identified from the NP/WLS/ESZ so far for development and other purpose since it's notification
S.no
Name of project
User Agency
Year
Area Diverted/ Permitted for use(ha.)
1.
Nil
NA
2020
0
Impact(s)due to the diversion of area for the use of land for the projects referred above:
Impact(s)due to the diversion of area for the use of land for the projects referred above
S.no
Name of project
Upload impact report
Area Diverted / Permitted for use
1.
Nil
Annexure Upload impact report
0
Whether the project proponents have ever committed violation of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972 or Forest Conservation Act,1980:
Whether the project proponents have ever committed violation of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972 or Forest Conservation Act,1980
S.no
Under Act
Name of Project
Details of violation
Period of work done
Area of forest land involved in violation
Name of person(s) responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person(s) responsible for violation
Action taken against the person(s) responsible for violation
Any other information that you would like to place on record for decision making:
Documents
S.No
Uploaded Additional Info.
Remarks
1.
Additional Info.
PArt-III Peddapally
2.
Additional Info.
SIR Peddapally
(v). Provide comprehensive details of the likely impact of the current proposal in terms of sections 29 and/or section 35(6) of the Wildlife(Protection)Act, 1972
:
Annexure Comprehensive letter
(vi).Has any work related to the project proposed been commenced at the proposed location
:
No
A-5
Site inspection report of the Wildlife Warden/Chief Wildlife Warden highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Chennur
Kawal Tiger Reserve
DFO
One
21/09/2020
Peddapalli
karimnagar
DFO
One
03/09/2020
(Specific recommendation of the Wildlife Warden/Chief Wildlife Warden with(Part II & III))
A-6
Specific recommendation of the Wildlife Warden/Chief Wildlife Warden for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Chennur
Kawal Tiger Reserve
DFO
Recommended
Recommended
Peddapalli
karimnagar
DFO
Recommended
Recommended
Communication of Sought coming to User Agency
Close(X)
Close(X)