PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UK-0152/2015
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttarakhand
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttarakhand  (ii) District : Rudraprayag  (iii) Forest Division : Rudraprayag  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.595  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Rudraprayag0.595Village Forest
Total 0.595
Division 1. : Rudraprayag
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Rudraprayag0.595
Total0.595
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.5950.4Eco 5
Total. 0.595


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Pinus roxburghiiChir01119181510
2Quercus leucotricophoraBanj002110
Total 0 1121 1916 10
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 77


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The area proposed for diversion is Revenue Forest. Working Plan for such forests is not prepared.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : no erosion pron zone
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1.00
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Ghurad, Kakad, Guldar etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Rudraprayag198400.00179099.50606.9791631158.61430/08/2017260.066898.548
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
RudraprayagGarhwalDFOYesOne24/12/2014
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
RudraprayagGarhwalDFO Recommendedthe proposal is related with development.
GarhwalCF RecommendedThe project is required for providing connectivity to the local people.Yes
Nodal Officer Recommendedforwarded hard copy and recommendation as per file attached
quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
UttarakhandState SecretaryRecommended17/04/2015RECOMMENDED, FORWARDED TO GOI BECAUSE OF MORE THANState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
DehradunRegional Office8B/UCP/06/207/2015/FC26/10/2017
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/UK/ROAD/8652/2014ROAD86522014924134977512 Mar 2019SBIN419071115664Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) : No
20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.Verified DateMutation LetterRemarks
FP/UK/ROAD/8652/201430 Mar 2019No Dataas per file attached
21. Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.Compliance Details submitted on(Date)Uploaded Letter
FP/UK/ROAD/8652/201415 May 2019
23. Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.RemarksVerified DateUploaded Letter
FP/UK/ROAD/8652/201423 Jan 2020
24. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/UK/ROAD/8652/201413 Feb 2020APPROVED