PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UK-023/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttarakhand
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttarakhand  (ii) District : Nainital  (iii) Forest Division : Nainital,Ramnagar  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.445  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Nainital3.15Reserved Forest
2Nainital0.36Village Forest
3Ramnagar1.17Reserved Forest
4Ramnagar0.765Van Panchayat Land
Total 5.445
Division 1. : Nainital
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Nainital3.51
Total3.51
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
13.510.4Eco 5
Total. 3.51


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Quercus leucotricophorabanj001000
2Toona ciliataTun2125311
3Misc. SpeciesSaaj034422
4Boehmeria rugulosaGethi001100
5Misc. SpeciesKukat356331863
6Bombax CeibaSemal000100
7Misc. SpeciesSaanan031011
8Syzigium CuminiJamun0141916710
9Misc. SpeciesPutli000010
Total 5 8864 4318 17
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 235


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : mixed forest
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : This area is not vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.01
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : leopard Kakar
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1Pauri GarhwalJuaa10.891104 1125 1136 1149 1159 1166 1174 1177 1188 1194 1221 1222 1235 1247 1289 1295 1307 1312 1318 1319 1320 1324 1328 1331 1333 1338 1345 1352 1357 1362 1363 1365 1367
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL
Division 2. : Ramnagar
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Nainital1.935
Total1.935
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.9350.3Eco 3
Total. 1.935


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Misc. SpeciesKukkat200000
2Grewia optovaBhimal200000
3Moringa oleiferaTimil110000
4Azadirachta IndicaJhingan830000
5PineCheed010000
6Cinnamomum tamalaKanela1660000
7Ougenia oogenesisSadan610000
8Misc. SpeciesGethi380100
9Syzigium CuminiJamun100000
10Toona ciliataTun010000
11Bauhinia ParvifloraQuaral010000
12Terminalia ArjunaSen012000
13Misc. SpeciesMehal100000
Total 40 232 10 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 66


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The working plan prescription is Miscellaneous Forest working circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : proposed area is not prone to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.01
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : leopard Kakar
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1Pauri GarhwalJuaa10.891104 1125 1136 1149 1159 1166 1174 1177 1188 1194 1221 1222 1235 1247 1289 1295 1307 1312 1318 1319 1320 1324 1328 1331 1333 1338 1345 1352 1357 1362 1363 1365 1367
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Land Schedule
2 CA Map
3 Google Map
4 CA Estimate
5 Digital Map
6 NPV
7 Tree ammunation
8 EDS Reply

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Nainital679400402040458.267291977.89030/08/2018929.5420
2Nainital679400402640175.5932114031/07/2017230.26420
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
RamnagarWesternDFOYesOne13/05/2019
NainitalSouth KumaunDFOYesOne23/05/2019
 South KumaunCFNoNo Data
 WesternCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
RamnagarWesternDFO RecommendedRecommended.
NainitalSouth KumaunDFO Recommendedpuble intrest
South KumaunCF RecommendedRecommended in public Interest Yes
WesternCF RecommendedAs Proposed by DFO.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedAs per file attached
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
UttarakhandState SecretaryRecommended31/10/2019 as per file attacheed State Govt. OfficerNo Data