PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UK-096/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttarakhand
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttarakhand  (ii) District : Dehradun  (iii) Forest Division : Mussoorie  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 3.528  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Mussoorie2.345Reserved Forest
2Mussoorie1.183Civil Soyam land
Total 3.528
Division 1. : Mussoorie
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Dehradun3.528
Total3.528
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
13.5280.4Eco 5
Total. 3.528


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersChirnai01011900
2OthersKamila012000
3OthersTilfara045000
4Toona ciliataToon021111
5Boehmeria rugulosaGenthi002310
6OthersJhikan0613620
7OthersVikelli000100
8OthersTimala004200
9Ficus ReligiosaPipal000010
10Syzigium CuminiJamun011000
11Bombax CeibaSemal016511
12Ougenia oogenesisSandan011410
13Cassia FistulaAmaltash021000
14Terminalia bellericaBahera038921
15Myrsine semiserrataGaunta031000
16OthersMandara010000
17OthersKuri010000
18Melia AzadirachtaBaken000100
19Pinus roxburghiiChir003000
20Tamarindus indicusEmali000100
21Emblica OfficinalisAnwala002010
22Celtis australisKarik011100
23Mangifera IndicaAam000102
Total 0 3762 4410 5
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 158


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Rajpur Compartment No.-7, Rekholi Compartment No.-8 & Rekholi Compartment No.-7 lies in conservation Protection working Circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The report of Senior Geologist is attached in proposal prapatra 33. The proposed forest land is not vulnerable to soil erosion therefor geographically stable.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.50
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Panthera pardus, Sus-scrofa cristatus, Selenarctos thibetanus & Hystix indica etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1DehradunKharsi7.0562336
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Location Map of Purkal Village to Bhitarali-Kimari PMGSY MR
2 PurkulWorkSanction_GONo-781_09-05-2017
3 Letter UA
4 Justification Purkul
5 Topo_CA_PurkultoBhitarli_MR-sign
6 GeoRef_Alignment_PurkultoBhitarli_MR-sign
7 Topo_Alignment_PurkultoBhitarli_MR-sign
8 Geo_Ref_CA_PurkultoBhitarli_MR-sign
9 FRA Certificate with Village level commette
10 Suitability of area identified for compensatory afforestation
11 Administrative Aproval
12 Geologist Report_Purkul
13 Joint Inspection Report
14 Undertaking to bear CA Cost
15 Part-V
16 Reviesed NPV Certificate
17 Authority of the person_ Forest Case
18 EDS Letter by UA
19 CA Etimate
20 CWLW Comments_Report
21 Part-II
22 EDS Letter by UA
23 Letter of SOI
24 EDS Letter by UA with incloser
25 Purkal -Bhitarli MR Geological Report
26 EDS Letter Incloser with by UA

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Dehradun308800211691262.5113115414.67831/12/2018317.6300
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
MussoorieYamunaDFOYesOne06/08/2018
 YamunaCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MussoorieYamunaDFO RecommendedTo Establish motor road connectivity to Purkulgaon to Bhitarli-Kimari Village. Site Inspection was done on 6-8-2018.
YamunaCF RecommendedProposal is recommended.Yes
Nodal Officer Recommendedas per file attached
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
UttarakhandState SecretaryRecommended25/09/2018 as per file atttached State Govt. OfficerNo Data