PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : RJ-053/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Rajasthan
 (i) State / Union Territory : Rajasthan  (ii) District : Bikaner  (iii) Forest Division : Bikaner Territorial,DCF STII BIKANER,Chhatargarh Territorial  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 8.8422  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Transmission Line
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Chhatargarh Territorial7.4398Protected Forest
2Bikaner Territorial0.0702Protected Forest
3DCF STII BIKANER1.3322Unclassed Forests
Total 8.8422
Division 1. : Bikaner Territorial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Bikaner0.0702
Total0.0702
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.07020Eco 4
Total. 0.0702


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : ROAD SIDE STRIP PF
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : NOT VULNERABLE TO EROSION
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : NO
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO) (i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 0
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NPV AMOUNT BIKANER TERRITORIAL
2 MEDICINE PLANTATION OF BIKANER TERRITORIAL
3 RECOMMANDATION BIKANER TERRITORIAL
Division 2. : Chhatargarh Territorial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
17.43980.05Eco 4
Total. 7.4398


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Acacia NiloticaDesi Babool2916013100
2OthersRohida2500000
3OthersKhejri020000
Total 316 6213 10 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 392


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Canal Side Strip Plantation.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Not Vulnerable to erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : CHINKARA, DIFFERENT KIND OF BIRDS AND REPTILES, WILD CAT, DESERT FOX ETC.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO) (i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 24.19756
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1117.6844PFCHATTARGARH5    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 IGNP_Notification
2 FOREST GAZETTE OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
3 MEDICINAL PLANTATION OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
4 NET PRESENT VALUE OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
5 TREE ENUMERATION OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
6 LAND SUITABILITY CERTIFICATE OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
7 C. A. SCHEME OF CHHATARGARH TERRITORIAL
8 Timber_Loss_Chhatargarh_Territorial
Division 3. : DCF STII BIKANER
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Bikaner1.3322
Total1.3322
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.33220.05Eco 4
Total. 1.3322


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Prasophis sinereriaKhejari030000
2OthersJHAR3400000
Total 34 30 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 37


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : To save the canal from siltation, plantation have been done on both sides of canal. In working plan there is provision to fell down the trees after maturity and there is provision to plant a new tree in place of that trees.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area is vulnerable to wind erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Cinkara , Different kind of Birds & Reptiles, Wild Cat , Desert Fox etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO) (i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 0.00
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 C.A. SCHEME OF IGNP STII BIKANER
2 Timber Loss IGNP STII Bikaner
3 TREE ENUMERATION OF IGNP STII BIKANER
4 NET PRESENT VALUE OF IGNP STII BIKANER
5 LAND SUITABILITY CERTIFICATE OF IGNP STII BIKANER
6 MEDICINAL PLANTATION OF IGNP STII BIKANER
7 TREE DETAILS OF IGNP STII BIKANER

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Bikaner3024790124900153.936134.2630/08/201759.08685.38
2Bikaner302479012490088.6626012/04/2019066.186
3Bikaner3024790124906153.32812022/07/201907
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Bikaner TerritorialBikanerDFOYesOne21/06/2019
Chhatargarh TerritorialBikanerDFOYesOne11/07/2019
DCF STII BIKANERBikanerDFOYesOne01/08/2019
 BikanerCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Bikaner TerritorialBikanerDFO Recommendedi recommended acceptance of proposal in public interest.
Chhatargarh TerritorialBikanerDFO Recommendedi recommended acceptance of proposal in public interest.
DCF STII BIKANERBikanerDFO RecommendedI recommended acceptance of the proposal in Public Interest.
BikanerCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe proposal is recommended in public interest
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
RajasthanState SecretaryRecommended06/01/2020 Recommended as per comments of Nodal Officer State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
LucknowRegional Office8B/Raj/04/1/2020/FC20/02/2020
24. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/RJ/TRANS/37354/2018Approved In-PrincipleNo Data