PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : RJ-043/2017
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Rajasthan
 (i) State / Union Territory : Rajasthan  (ii) District : Kota  (iii) Forest Division : Kota Territorial  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 96  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Kota Territorial96Reserved Forest
Total 96
Division 1. : Kota Territorial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kota96
Total96
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
1960Eco 3
Total. 96


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Ficus Bengalensisbargad0022010
2Ficus Religiosapipal02102261
3Dalburgia Sisoosisam21514810
4Azadirachta Indicaneem012441610
5Ailanthus excelsaardu016000
6Delonix Regiagulmoher026000
7Delonix Regiagulmoher026000
8Delonix Regiagulmohar026000
9Prosophis Spicigerajangle jelebi008610
10Eucalyptussafeda002301
11Bauhinia Parviflorakachnar014000
12Holoptolia Integrifoliachrel115000
13Aegle Marmelosbilvepatra010000
14Albezzia Labbecksiras001000
15Peltoform Pterocarpumpaltaform012000
16Cassia Fistulaamaltash022000
17Ficus Racemosagular001100
18Saraca Asocaashok030000
19Pongamia Pinnatakarange001000
20Bombax Ceibasamal000100
Total 3 45120 7710 2
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 257


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Plantation Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : area is not vulnerable for soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : NO
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): Enchroment is done by Construction of shops on 24.
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 1996
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 24.06
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1RIICORIICO KOTARIICO
2Sh BD AgarwalSectary of Mandi FIR Issued
3Sh Tej singh KalviEx Sectray of mandiFIR issued
4Sh OP SharmaEx Regional ManagerFIR issued
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1Kotaguraytha borina khurd9695,100,101,102,106,107,109,110,111,114,174
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 DFL Map
2 Recommandation latter with sign
3 DFL scheme
4 DFL Gt Map
5 Wall Amount Deposit Undertaking
6 NPV
7 LAND SUITABILTY
8 Violation Responsible Person
9 Block Notification
10 SITE INSPECTION
11 Undertaking no new construction

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kota52170076654.842086.14629467.15615/12/2017457.135497.80
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Kota TerritorialKotaDFOYesOne03/07/2020
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Kota TerritorialKotaDFO RecommendedTHERE IS NO ALTERNATE WAY FOR BHAMASHAH KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI
KotaCF RecommendedAs per order of Honourable SC, the MOEF & CC has imposed the condition number 5 for developing the green corridor along with NH-76 upto the distance of one kilometer in width on both sides of the NH-76. Hence first of all this condition imposed by the Honorable SC has to be waved first, only then the proposal can be recommended for diversion to avoid any adverse action by the Honorable SC. Yes