PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : OR-054/2016
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Orissa
 (i) State / Union Territory : Orissa  (ii) District : Keonjhar  (iii) Forest Division : Keonjhar  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 160.838  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Mining
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Keonjhar160.838Non-forest land recorded as Forest as on 25.10.1980.
Total 160.838
Division 1. : Keonjhar
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Keonjhar160.838
Total160.838
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
1160.8380.5Eco 1
Total. 160.838


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Dalbergia sisooSisoo099510
2Acacia catechuKhair033000
3Shorea robustaSal010855720
4Pterocarpus marsupiumPiasal03532601
5Gmelina arboreaGambhari052100
6Adina cordifoliaKurum064341113
7Ougeinia ougenensisBandhan096100
8Terminalia tomentosaAssan0165110
9Syzygium cuminiJamu0127122
10Bridelia retusaKasi068110
11Diospyros melanoxylonKendu08430823
12Misc. SpeciesMIsc Species010455892155044
Total 0 1396780 25760 53
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 2546


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : No
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.5
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : leopard, bear, barking dear, hyena, porcupine
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): The lessee has carried out mining activities in vi
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 19832009
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 31.1791
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Mr. Vk Seth,Mr. Rabindra Singh Garbyal, Mr. Rajesh Patel, Mr. Santosh Kumar Panda, Mr. Sanjit Kumar AdhyaMines ManagerOne OR case has been booked
2
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1DhenkanalKerajodi160.841Khata No. 155, Plot No. 1,38,398,310-322 and 395
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Annexure- VII
2 Compliance of statute
3 Forwarding
4 Violation observed during field inspection
5 DGPS Map
6 Check List
7 Tree enumeration

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Keonjhar830300336615.629310275.2964746664.485503/05/20174148.925983.9016
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
KeonjharRourkelaDFOYesTwo22/04/2017,03/05/2017
 RourkelaCFYesOne24/05/2017
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
KeonjharRourkelaDFO RecommendedKatamati Iron ore Mines of M/s TATA Steel Ltd, granted over 403.3238 ha, involves 57.552 ha Reserved Forest, 141.62 ha Revenue Forest, 160.838 ha Non-Forest Land recorded as Forest as on 25.10.1980 and 43.3138 ha Non-forest land. NPV over entire forest land involved in the mining lease is deposited in Adhoc CAMPA as per prevailing rate. No Forest land has been diverted under Sec 2(ii) of FC Act, 1980 and 199.172 ha forest land stands diverted under Sec 2(iii) of the said Act pursuant to the app
RourkelaCF RecommendedAs per diversion proposal the C.B. ratio of the project is 1:58.36Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
OrissaState SecretaryRecommended20/12/2017Recommended vide letter no 26364 dated 19.12.2017 State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
BhubaneswarHead Office8-01/2018-FC20/08/2018
24. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/OR/MIN/20081/2016Approved In-PrincipleNo Data