PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MZ-03/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Mizoram
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Mizoram
(ii)
District :
Saitual
(iii)
Forest Division :
Champhai,Aizawl
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
8.862
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Aizawl
5.99
Reserved Forest
Total
5.99
Division 1. : Aizawl
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
5.99
45
Eco 1
Total.
5.99
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Batling
12
0
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Bulpui
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Chhawntual
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Fartuah
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Hnahkhar
7
0
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Hnahkiah
5
1
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Hnum
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Albizia Procera
Kangtek
6
3
0
0
0
0
9
Schima Wallichii Chois
Khiang
3
3
0
0
0
0
10
Bischofia Javanica
Khuangthli
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Lamkhuang
1
2
0
0
0
0
12
Syzigium Cumini
Lenhmui
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Nauthak
0
2
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Nganbawm
1
4
0
0
0
0
15
Michelia Champaka
Ngiau
0
5
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Pang
7
5
0
0
0
0
17
Others
Sehawr
0
2
0
0
0
0
18
Others
Sertawk
1
0
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Sihneh
1
0
0
0
0
0
20
Emblica Officinalis
Sunhlu
3
2
0
0
0
0
21
Others
Tatkawng
1
5
0
0
0
0
22
Others
Taitaw
0
2
0
0
0
0
23
Tectona Grandis
Teak
2
7
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Tei
0
3
0
0
0
0
25
Others
Theibate
0
2
0
0
0
0
26
Syzigium Sps
Theichhawl
0
3
0
0
0
0
27
Mangifera Indica
Theihai
1
3
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Theitat
0
2
0
0
0
0
29
Others
Theitit
8
0
0
0
0
0
30
Ailanthus Grandis Prain
Thingarthau
2
0
0
0
0
0
31
Others
Thingdawl
1
6
0
0
0
0
32
Others
Thingkha
2
2
0
0
0
0
33
Others
Thingkhim
2
0
0
0
0
0
34
Albzzia Spp.
Thingri
2
1
0
0
0
0
35
Castanopsis Tribuloides
Thingsia
0
6
0
0
0
0
36
Others
Thingtheihmu
2
0
0
0
0
0
37
Gmelin Arborea
Thlanvawng
1
2
0
0
0
0
38
Albzzia Spp.
Vang
11
6
0
0
0
0
39
Others
Vaube
4
2
0
0
0
0
40
Others
Zairum
6
3
0
0
0
0
41
Others
Zawngtah
1
0
0
0
0
0
42
Chukrasia Tabularis
Zawngtei
1
0
0
0
0
0
43
Duabanga Grandiflora
Zuang
2
1
0
0
0
0
Total
98
92
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
190
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The proposed area is not much vulnerable to soil erosion as there is good ground cover.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NA
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
11.68697
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
9.058
Community land
Chhingchhip
NIL
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 2. : Champhai
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Saitual
9.2625
Total
9.2625
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
9.2625
40
Eco 5
Total.
9.2625
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albzzia Spp.
Vang
5
10
0
0
0
0
2
Ficus Lacor
Theipui
22
17
0
0
0
0
3
Pakia Biglandulosa
Zawngtah
19
3
2
0
0
0
4
Gmelina Aroborea
Thlanvawng
0
2
19
2
0
0
5
Erythrina Indica
Fartuah
5
0
1
0
0
0
6
Albzzia Spp.
Fah
3
0
0
0
0
0
7
Artocarpus Hirsuta
Theitat
2
10
2
0
0
0
8
Chukrasia Tabularis
Teipui
1
4
4
5
0
0
9
Alnus Nepalensis
Hriang
11
8
0
0
0
0
10
Phoebe Attenuata Nees.
Bul
2
2
1
1
0
0
11
Schima Wallichii Chois
Khiang
3
10
0
0
0
0
12
Castanopsis Tribuloides
Thingsia
9
20
2
0
0
0
13
Rhus Spp.
Khawmhma
2
0
0
0
0
0
Total
84
86
31
8
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
209
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
NIL
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
NIL
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
NIL
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
NIL
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
NIL
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
NIL
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
NIL
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
NIL
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Saitual
175700
152800
0
0
0
12/05/2022
0
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Aizawl
Central circle
DFO
Yes
One
08/04/2022
Champhai
Central circle
DFO
Yes
Two
13/06/2022,24/06/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Aizawl
Central circle
DFO
Recommended
Upgradation to 2 lane with paved shoulders of Tuivai Keifang section, NH 102B within the state of Mizoram, falling under Aizawl Forest Division is an essential project for the state.The portion of the forest land to be diverted is 5.99 Ha and there is no alternative options.Hence, recommended for approval.
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×