PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-02/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Chandel
(iii)
Forest Division :
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
111.05
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Transmission Line
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
24.329
Wildlife Sanctuary
2
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
86.721
Unclassed Forests
Total
111.05
Division 1. : Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chandel
111.05
Total
111.05
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
86.721
60
Eco 1
2
24.329
65
Eco 1
Total.
111.05
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Alnus Nepalensis
pareng
0
78
0
0
0
0
2
Albzzia Spp.
albzzia
0
69
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Thanji
0
109
14
0
0
0
4
Others
quercus
0
248
26
0
0
0
5
Others
Heikreng (Celtis australis
0
118
19
0
0
0
6
Cinnamomum Zeylanicum
Usingsa
0
6
0
0
0
0
7
Emblica Officianalis
Heikru
0
12
0
0
0
0
8
Misc. Species
uningthou manbi
0
36
5
0
0
0
9
Others
usoi
0
158
12
0
0
0
10
Syzigium Cumini
Sileima
0
30
3
0
0
0
11
Others
Tairen (Toona ciliata)
0
0
1
0
0
0
12
Others
Linpop
0
24
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Pheija (Wendlandra glabra)
0
48
0
0
0
0
14
Misc. Species
Uthangjing
0
19
3
0
0
0
15
Misc. Species
Wangthinam
0
73
10
0
0
0
16
Misc. Species
Larong
0
84
0
0
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Thanji (Castanopsis)*
0
44
0
0
0
0
18
Misc. Species
Kheu (Melanorhoea usitata)*
0
4
0
0
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Meijigri (Xylia dolabriformis)*
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
Bauhinia Parviflora
Chingthrao*
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
Misc. Species
Khangra (Dipterocarpus turbiculatus)*
0
88
0
0
0
0
22
Others
others*
0
34
0
0
0
0
Total
0
1282
93
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1375
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The forest land proposed for diversion falls within the Plantation, Protection and fuel/fodder working circles. Besides, the forest area of Wildlife sanctuary proposed to be diverted is managed separately.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The project site is linear in nature with narrow width as such erosion might be considerably low or negligible.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
the area is rich in wildlife as some portion of the site also forms a part of Wildlife sanctuary. Some of the important animals present include slow Loris, Leopard cat, clouded leopard, python and Mr.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The electric transmission line of the project will pass through the Yangnoupokpi Lokchao Wildlife Sanctuary. The impact of the project on the sanctuary might not be that high as only a linear strip of 3m width would be cleared on the ground. This shall also be planted with dwarf species.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
the name of the protected area is the Yangnoupokpi Lokchao Wildlife Sanctuary and the impact is same as mentioned above
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Passes through the Yangnoupokpi Lokchao Wildlife Sanctuary and impact would be same as mentioned above
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
395
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
44
Kangbung RF
Chakpikarong Range
12
View file
2
3
44
Gamphajol Block
Morch Range
1
View file
3
4
43
Charangching block
Chandel Range
34
View file
4
2
43
Tonglang Block
Tengnoupal Raitge
2
View file
5
5
49
Yangoupokpi Sanctuary
Morch Range
Near the River
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
site inspection report of the Deputy Conservator of Forests
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chandel
331300
280700
34.54
2
70
19/01/2016
70
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
15/01/2016
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
19/01/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The diversion being linear in nature, might not impact significantly in the ecology of the forests. On the other hand, the project will provide basic electricity needs to the people of Moreh township.
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
as the project is for improvement of basic amenities of the people-power supply, it is Recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The project proposal being a public utility project causing less disturbance to Forest & Environment is recommended.
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
10/02/2016
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3.MN C 007/2016-SHI
30/09/2016
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/TRANS/17453/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×