PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-01/2017
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Chandel  (iii) Forest Division : DCF: Park & Sanctuary  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 6.552  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1DCF: Park & Sanctuary6.552Wild Life Sanctuary
Total 6.552
Division 1. : DCF: Park & Sanctuary
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Chandel6.552
Total6.552
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
16.55240Eco 1
Total. 6.552


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Acacia AuriculiformisAcacia010000
2Misc. SpeciesAgar014000
3Misc. SpeciesBoroi042100
4Anacardium OccidentaleChashew nut020000
5Misc. SpeciesGoldmohor000100
6Tectona GrandisChingsu0127400
7embelica officinalisHeikru040000
8Juglan RegiaHeijuga020000
9Mangifera IndicaHeinou083200
10Misc. SpeciesHeirit062000
11Syzigium CuminiJam020000
12Misc. Specieskhabi001000
13Misc. SpeciesKhangra04326500
14Misc. SpeciesKhe-u064100
15Misc. SpeciesMekruk022100
16Misc. SpeciesSahi0116000
17Misc. SpeciesTheibong021200
18Terminalia MyriocarpaTolhao001100
19Misc. SpeciesTumila050000
20Albizzia lebbeckUil020000
21Bischofia JavanicaUthumnaraobi053000
22Misc. SpeciesUyung088000
23Gmelin ArboreaWang052100
24Misc. SpeciesYongchak064400
25Misc. SpeciesUchan032100
26Misc. SpeciesSayom000100
Total 0 14078 250 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 243


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The proposed diverted area is under Wildlife and hence there is no working plan prescription.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : There is no vulnerability of forest area to erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Hoolok gibbon, Golden cats, Leopard, Elephants, Slow loris, Serow, Malayan, Pangolin, Macaques, Mrs. Humes bar backed pheasant, Hornbills, Burmese peafowl among birds and animals and reptiles like Python, Cobra, Krait, Monitor lizard, Tokay gekko are major species found in the sanctuary
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The construction of bypass may have some disturbance in the flora and fauna of the Sanctuary. Clear-felling of the diverted area may cause some impact.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 28.12
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1114othersYLWS Range-IYLWLS    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Chandel3313002933.8155.524231.05111/02/2017700
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
DCF: Park & SanctuaryWildlife ConservationDFOYesTwo18/01/2017,06/02/2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
DCF: Park & SanctuaryWildlife ConservationDFO RecommendedConstruction of bypass in the existing road will benefit the road connectivity and livelihood of the people.
Wildlife ConservationCF RecommendedThe Project will provide proper communication system for the local people thereby rendering better livelihood opportunity and overall improvement of standard of livingYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedAs the Project proposal is a public Utility Project it is recommended for approval for diversion under FC Act 1980.
quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended20/06/2017Recommended. State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShillongRegional Office3-MN C 054/2018-SHI10/01/2019
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/23040/2016ROAD23040201676832674800Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/23040/2016Approved In-PrincipleNo Data