PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-01/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Chandel
(iii)
Forest Division :
DCF: Park & Sanctuary
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
6.552
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
DCF: Park & Sanctuary
6.552
Wild Life Sanctuary
Total
6.552
Division 1. : DCF: Park & Sanctuary
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chandel
6.552
Total
6.552
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
6.552
40
Eco 1
Total.
6.552
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Auriculiformis
Acacia
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Misc. Species
Agar
0
1
4
0
0
0
3
Misc. Species
Boroi
0
4
2
1
0
0
4
Anacardium Occidentale
Chashew nut
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
Misc. Species
Goldmohor
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
Tectona Grandis
Chingsu
0
12
7
4
0
0
7
embelica officinalis
Heikru
0
4
0
0
0
0
8
Juglan Regia
Heijuga
0
2
0
0
0
0
9
Mangifera Indica
Heinou
0
8
3
2
0
0
10
Misc. Species
Heirit
0
6
2
0
0
0
11
Syzigium Cumini
Jam
0
2
0
0
0
0
12
Misc. Species
khabi
0
0
1
0
0
0
13
Misc. Species
Khangra
0
43
26
5
0
0
14
Misc. Species
Khe-u
0
6
4
1
0
0
15
Misc. Species
Mekruk
0
2
2
1
0
0
16
Misc. Species
Sahi
0
11
6
0
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Theibong
0
2
1
2
0
0
18
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
0
0
1
1
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Tumila
0
5
0
0
0
0
20
Albizzia lebbeck
Uil
0
2
0
0
0
0
21
Bischofia Javanica
Uthumnaraobi
0
5
3
0
0
0
22
Misc. Species
Uyung
0
8
8
0
0
0
23
Gmelin Arborea
Wang
0
5
2
1
0
0
24
Misc. Species
Yongchak
0
6
4
4
0
0
25
Misc. Species
Uchan
0
3
2
1
0
0
26
Misc. Species
Sayom
0
0
0
1
0
0
Total
0
140
78
25
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
243
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed diverted area is under Wildlife and hence there is no working plan prescription.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
There is no vulnerability of forest area to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Hoolok gibbon, Golden cats, Leopard, Elephants, Slow loris, Serow, Malayan, Pangolin, Macaques, Mrs. Humes bar backed pheasant, Hornbills, Burmese peafowl among birds and animals and reptiles like Python, Cobra, Krait, Monitor lizard, Tokay gekko are major species found in the sanctuary
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The construction of bypass may have some disturbance in the flora and fauna of the Sanctuary. Clear-felling of the diverted area may cause some impact.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
28.12
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
14
others
YLWS Range-I
YLWLS
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chandel
331300
2933.8
155.52
4
231.051
11/02/2017
70
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
DCF: Park & Sanctuary
Wildlife Conservation
DFO
Yes
Two
18/01/2017,06/02/2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
DCF: Park & Sanctuary
Wildlife Conservation
DFO
Recommended
Construction of bypass in the existing road will benefit the road connectivity and livelihood of the people.
Wildlife Conservation
CF
Recommended
The Project will provide proper communication system for the local people thereby rendering better livelihood opportunity and overall improvement of standard of living
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
As the Project proposal is a public Utility Project it is recommended for approval for diversion under FC Act 1980.
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
20/06/2017
Recommended.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-MN C 054/2018-SHI
10/01/2019
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/23040/2016
ROAD230402016768
32,674,800.00
32,674,800.00
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
05/03/2019
05/03/2019
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/23040/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×