PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-05/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Imphal East,Kangpokpi,Kamjong,Ukhrul  (iii) Forest Division : Central Forest Division,Imphal,Thoubal Forest Division,Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 98  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul77.139Unclassed Forests
2Central Forest Division,Imphal12.6907Reserved Forest
3Thoubal Forest Division8.1702Reserved Forest
Total 97.9999
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
112.690710Eco 1
Total. 12.6907


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Gmelin ArboreaWang11909687469500
2OthersUyung (Quercus serrata)117430132000
3Psidium Guajavapungdol1600000
4OthersTairel (Toona ciliata)636216000
5Tectona GrandisChingsoo11114332000
6OthersYongchak (parkia spp.)06316000
7Artocarpus HeterophyllusTheibong0016000
8Eucalyptus sppNasik3200000
9Albizzia proceraKhal3295163200
10Albzzia Spp.Khok164848000
11OthersUningthou (Phoeba hainensiana)1434832000
12OthersSamjenhei0160000
13OthersShamba ( oroxylum indicum)1600000
14OthersLimphop (Engelhardtia spicata)16630000
15OthersLamok (cordia dichotoma)48321616160
16Bischofia JavanicaUthum naraobi0160000
17OthersAshi Heibong ( Ficus hispida)163248000
18Emblica OfficianalisHeikru1600000
19OthersAakman (lennea grandis)0160000
20Terminalia MyriocarpaTolhao1111430000
21Albizzia lebbeckUil063161600
22OthersZoidak16480000
23OthersHeirit (Ficus cunia)32790000
24OthersHeirikokthong (Artocarpus lakoocha)0160000
25PineUchan0016000
26Albzzia Spp.Luwangkhoi0160000
27OthersUreirom (Bixa orellana)0320000
28OthersChingthrao0160000
29Bombax Ceibatera0160000
Total 3048 23321050 15916 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 6605


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The roads are to be expanded by cutting the Hill earth which are generally very steep.Therefore, during monsoon ,the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslide
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The area has no report of the presence of scheduled I species
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 69.85
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1126Chingkheiching RFSawombung Range3    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 CA Estimates
2 NPV
3 CERTIFICATE OF NON AVAILABILITY OF NON FOREST LAND FOR CA
Division 2. : Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
177.13935Eco 1
Total. 77.139


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Alnus NepalensisPareng98976681242000
2OthersCherry0791395000
3Juglan RegiaHeijuka08473092000
4PineUchan5935930000
5OthersQuercus011860000
6OthersMichelia doltsopa2128191059000
7OthersSahi kuhi98911861469000
8OthersUsoi00847000
9OthersThingchithing364330783148000
Total 6426 1616811252 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 33846


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The roads are to be expanded by cutting the hill earth which are generally very step. Therefore, during the monsoon, the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslide.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The area has no reports of the presence of Schedule I species of animals
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): Fresh cutting, breaking and removal of hill earth
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 0.2
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 5
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Varaha Infra LtdPremchand Singh son of Kishore Singh from Kwikhon Imphal EastThe accused was charge with a fine of Rs one lakh nineteen thousand two hundred and thrity eight only for the violation of Act and Rules
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 318.5
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1180UnclassJessami Range30    View file
2275UnclassUKhrul Range5    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 FCA violation
Division 3. : Thoubal Forest Division
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Ukhrul6.2389
2Kamjong1.9313
Total8.1702
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
18.170220Eco 1
Total. 8.1702


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Gmelina ArboreaWang30260000
2Terminalia MyriocarpaTolhao5500000
3Castanopsis TribuloidesThangji311115000
4Misc. SpeciesUyung7462000
5PineUchan4012000
6Misc. SpeciesKurao angouba5010000
7Bombax CeibaTera602000
8Misc. SpeciesKhongnang111000
9Misc. SpeciesYongchak020000
10EucalyptusNasik300000
11Jacaranda Mimosifolia001000
12Misc. SpeciesTumitla200000
Total 161 9643 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 300


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Protection Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The project envisages widening of existing road by cutting of hill earth which may make the area vulnerable to erosion during rainy season.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No rare and endangered species found in the area.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 41.8988
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1116.34Waithou PFThoubal RangeP11,P12    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Imphal East497002644214.11028.221/06/202217.0580
2Ukhrul454400358200744.451469.406/05/20221463.40
3Ukhrul454400358200744.451469.420/04/20221469.40
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Eastern Forest Division,UkhrulEastern Forest CircleDFOYesOne23/04/2022
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFOYesOne20/04/2022
 Central Forest CircleCFYesOne20/05/2022
 Eastern Forest CircleCFYesOne19/05/2022
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
Thoubal Forest DivisionCentral Forest CircleDFOYesOne01/05/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Eastern Forest Division,UkhrulEastern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland road section of NH 202 into two laning with paved shoulder of 0.000km from Laikot to Finch Corner 30.970 km in the state of Manipur on EPC mode by NHIDCL would improve the socio economic profile of the people in an around Ukhrul District. The proposed area is unavoidable and barest minimum. So, it is recommended that forest land proposed to be diverted, may be made available for the construction of the road.
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFO Recommended The proposed widening of road shall provide the much needed better road connectivity between Imphal and Ukhrul District of Manipur and also beyond Ukhrul upto the State of Nagaland. The road will improve the economic growth of the hill district and subsequently escalate the standard of living of the people therein
Thoubal Forest DivisionCentral Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland road section of NH 202 into two laning with paved shoulder of 0.000km from Laikot to Finch Corner 30.970 km in the state of Manipur on EPC mode by NHIDCL would improve the socio economic profile of the people in an around Ukhrul District. The proposed area is unavoidable and barest minimum. So, it is recommended that forest land proposed to be diverted, may be made available for the construction of the road.
Central Forest CircleCF Recommended The proposal for widening and improvement of NH 202 into two laning is for improvement of road connectivity in hill areas of Manipur from Yaingangpokpi via Ukhrul to Nagaland. Proposed forest area for diversion is barest minimum and no alternate possible alignments are seen. The proposal for diversion of 20.8609 hectare forest land 12.6907 Ha in Yaingangpokpi RF and Khamenlok Gwaltabi RF under Central Forest Division, Imphal and 8.1702 Ha in Yaingangpokpi Unclassed Forest under the Thoubal Forest Division, Thoubal is recommended under the following conditions a Adequate measures to check soil erosion and land slide may be taken up at the project cost. Yes
Eastern Forest CircleCF Recommended The proposal for widening and improvement of NH 202 into two laning is for improvement of road connectivity from Yaingangpokpi to Ukhrul, then to Nagaland. Proposed forest area for diversion is barest minimum and no alternate possible alignments are seen. The proposal for diversion of 77.1391 hectare unclassed forest land under Ukhrul Forest Division, Manipur is recommended subject to the the condition that adequate measures to check soil erosion and land slide may be taken up at the project cost.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe proposed road, in its entirety, will connect the underdeveloped district of Ukhrul with the State Capital Imphal and thus, facilitate efficient movement of people and goods which are crucial for development. Once completed, the road will greatly benefit the inhabitants of the area and their economic and social development will be accelerated.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended26/08/2022Public utility projectState Govt. OfficerNo Data