PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-02/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Kangpokpi  (iii) Forest Division : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur,Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi,Noney forest division  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 17.91  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur11.749Protected Forest
2Noney forest division5.254Unclassed Forests
3Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi0.907Protected Forest
Total 17.91
Division 1. : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
111.749100Eco 1
Total. 11.749


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Misc. Speciesheibi030000
2Mangifera IndicaHeinou030000
3Acacia AuricuiformisAcacia200000
4Albezzia LabbeckKhok2742000
5Polyainthia LongifoliaAshoka300000
6Cassia SiameaCasia300000
7Misc. SpeciesChigonglei1000000
8Misc. SpeciesAshi Heibong050020
9Misc. SpeciesChorphon240000
10Misc. SpeciesCupressus500000
11Delonix RegiaGulmohar000020
12Aegle MarmelosHarikakhog040000
13Misc. SpeciesHeibi030000
14Misc. SpeciesHeibong300000
15Emblica OfficianalisHeikru1500000
16Rhus Spp.Heimang31800000
17Misc. SpeciesHeining500000
18Mangifera IndicaHeinou150000
19Misc. SpeciesHeirit4100000
20Misc. SpeciesHeitup2000000
21Misc. SpeciesJakaranda010000
22Syzigium CuminiJam010000
23Albizia ProceraKhal14100000
24Albzzia Spp.Khok77500040
25Ficus ReligiosaSana Khongnang002000
26Ficus BengalensisKhongnang Bot020000
27Greviia RobustaKoubilia010010
28Erythrina IndicaKurao060000
29Terminalia ChebulaManahi400000
30Pterocarpus MarsupiumMishi91250000
31Eucalyptus sppNashik6714180
32Misc. SpeciesNobab100000
33Misc. SpeciesChinese Teak300000
34Alnus NepalensisPareng41930119000
35Psidium GuajavaPungthon820000
36Melia AzadirachtaSeijrak020000
37Chukrasia TabularisTaimareng3950000
38Tooni CedrelaTairen42200000
39Tectona GrandisTeak160000
40Bombax CeibaTera020000
41Artocarpus HeterophyllusTheibong7101000
42Terminalia MyriocarpaTolhao2600700
43PineUchan1759681836
44Misc. SpeciesU Hal3002300
45Misc. SpeciesUningthou thoidingnam020000
46Albezzia LabbeckUil100000
47Cinnamomum ZeylanicumUshingsha400000
48Schima Wallichii ChoisUsoi1639611000
49Albezzia LabbeckUil2500000
50Misc. SpeciesUyung149980000
51Gmelin ArboreaWang903891600
52Misc. SpeciesYawl800000
53Misc. SpeciesYongchak1010000
54BambooWa180500000
55Misc. SpeciesTumitla5114825000
Total 3653 102191 6520 6
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 4856


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed diversion area is for the linear expansion of NH-37, no erosion will occur
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 33.339
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1123.498Tairenpokpi Tamenglong PFBishnupur Range8    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL
Division 2. : Noney forest division
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
15.25430Eco 1
Total. 5.254


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Bombax Ceibatera00305200
2PineUchan06015000
3OthersYoungchak152545100
4Otherschingthrao05015100
5Erythrina Indicakurao angangba304070000
6Duabanga GrandifloraTal02550300
7Melia AzadirachtaSeichrak40455000
8Othersuyung255518000
9Mangifera IndicaHeinou1582000
Total 125 308250 570 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 740


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 2
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Monitor lizards, leopard cat and other reptiles
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 24.13
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1110.508othersNoncy Range52    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL
Division 3. : Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kangpokpi17.91
Total17.91
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.90760Eco 1
Total. 0.907


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Tooni Cedrelatairen303512000
2Gmelin Arboreawang7222000
3Michelia Champakaleihao160000
4Terminalia Myriocarpatolhao1503400
5Misc. Speciesuningthoumanbi040000
6Schima Wallichii Choisusoi4015000
7Pineuchan007000
8Alnus Nepalensispareng020000
9Azadirachta Indicaneem10100000
10Eucalyptusnashik14187819310
11Misc. Speciesacacia003000
12Albzzia Spp.khok258000
13Misc. Speciesagar350000
14Misc. Specieschinese teak0350000
15Delonix Regiagulmohar2019800
16Misc. Specieschigonglei060000
17Calistemon Lanceolatuscheiteklei1400000
18Greviia Robustakoubila407000
19Ficus Religiosa000200
20Misc. Speciesrubber tree020000
21Misc. Specieslamok020000
22Polyainthia Longifoliafalse ashoka0130000
23Melia Azadirachtaseichrak030000
Total 106 148174 3331 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 492


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : plantation working circle and Fuel & Fodder Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : slope varies from 40 to 70 % and top soil is loosely packed.The area proposed for diversion would be susceptible to erosion if it is without the present vegetation
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : there is no noticeable wildlife observed within this stretch of 0.907 ha area of land
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 2.54
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
111.814kangchup leimakhong Irang PFMotbung Range2    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kangpokpi113411.2895684.171.29952009/03/20222.5990
2Kangpokpi188567.71165091.0310122202422/03/202220240
3Kangpokpi268949108,781.1347.569395.0223/03/202247.5690
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne25/02/2022
Northern Forest Division,KtuigpokpiNorthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne05/02/2022
 Northern Forest CircleCFYesOne25/03/2022
Noney forest divisionWestern Forest CircleDFOYesOne16/02/2022
 Western Forest CircleCFYesOne24/03/2022
 Southern Forest CircleCFNoNo Data
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe required forest land as proposed by the User Agency is unavoidable and barest minimum for the expansion of the NH 37 into two lanning.
Noney forest divisionWestern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe Diversion of the said Forest Area for the proposed project is of huge Significance to the people of Noney Tamenglong and Jiribam District. it is also one of the lifeline of the state hence it would be a boon to the development of the state as a whole
Northern Forest Division,KtuigpokpiNorthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe imphal jiribam road section of NH 37 is one of the lifeline of the State for transportation of goods and many essential commodities. Considering the need for safe and better road connectivity among the villages, district and states for improvement of socio economic benefit of the people of the State Manipur the project is recommended
Northern Forest CircleCF Recommended Imphal Jiribam is a lifeline of the State of Manipur connecting to other parts of the country. Widening and improvement of the Road Section into two laning will enhance connectivity and saftety of the travellers. The proposal for diversion of 0.907 Hectare forest land falling within Tairenpokpi Tamenglong Protetced Forest is the barest minimum and unavoidable. The proposal of NHIDCL is recommended with the conditions recommended by the DFO, Kangpokpi Forest Division. Yes
Western Forest CircleCF RecommendedThe proposed road interconnects Manipur and Assam which will boost economic growth and poverty reduction which will bring substantial social and economic development in the region – Noney, Tamenglong & Jiribam. The project involved minimum tree felling and no significant adverse impact on the existing eco system is anticipated. The proposed area is the barest minimum and for public utility. Therefore, the project is recommended for consideration.Yes
Southern Forest CircleCF RecommendedThe project proposal involved minimum felling of trees which also involved some bamboo clumps, and no significant or adverse impact on the existing forest ecosystem is anticipated. Being a public utility project and second life line for the State of Manipur for improvement of the socio economic development of the people of the district in particular and Manipur State in general, the project proposal is recommended. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe proposed road will connect the underdeveloped districts of the State of Manipur with the State of Assam and thus, facilitate efficient movement of people and goods which are crucial for development. Once completed, the road will greatly benefit the inhabitants of the area and their economic and social development will be accelerated.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended03/08/2022Public Utility projectState Govt. OfficerNo Data