PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-011/2021
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Imphal East  (iii) Forest Division : Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.37  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi0.37Protected Forest
Total 0.37
Division 1. : Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Imphal East0.37
Total0.37
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.3760Eco 1
Total. 0.37


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Otherssahi6300000
2OthersTairen1540000
3Rhus Spp.heimang1000000
4Schima Wallichii Choisusoi330000
5OthersTumitla2700000
6Syzigium Cuminijamun400000
7embelica officinalisheikru400000
8Othersyenpakla8700000
9Bambooutang7200000
Total 285 70 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 292


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Plantation Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area is moderately prone to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : no rare or endangered species found in the area
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1.04
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
110.74othersSaikul Range5    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Imphal East669002200022.65160.029/07/202127.2860.0
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Northern Forest Division,KtuigpokpiNorthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne23/07/2021
 Northern Forest CircleCFYesOne07/08/2021
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Northern Forest Division,KtuigpokpiNorthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe Project is recommended subject to the following conditions 1. The UA shall construct boundary pillars at the project cost demarcating the area as it is a Protected Forest 2. Retaining Walls shall be constructed along the boundaries
Northern Forest CircleCF Recommended Removal of blind corner and straightening of the approach road will reduce road accident and loss of human life. The proposed forest area of 0.37 hectare is barest minimum and is unavoidable. Being hilly terrain with moderate slop, exposed sufarce after removal of blind corner shall be prone to land slip. Protection measure such as protection/retaining wall shall be required to be constructed to avoid land slips during rainy season. The proposal is recommended subject to the following conditions a Boundary of the forest and diverted forest land may be demarcated by erecting boundary pillars at the project costs. b Soil conservation measures such as protection/retaining wall may be constructed at project costs to avoid landslides. c No labour camp shall be constructed inside the forest. d While removing the blind corner and straightening of the road, a huge quantity of hill earth is likely to be generated. The User Agency may be allowed to transport the excess earth, if any, with prior permit of the DFO, Kangpokpi and on payment of royalty etc according to Rule No.33 of the Manipur Forest Rules, 1971 and Hon’ble Manipur High Court Order dated 25.07.2018 passed in M.C. PIL No.29 of 2017 with PIL No.25 of 2017. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe project is a public utility project involving Road, which will reduce road accidents and lost of human lives due to non visibility. It will improve the accessibility to the area for the people resulting in development for them.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended16/08/2021RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShillongState Government20/44/2021-For&Envt13/08/2021
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/144760/2021ROAD144760202194345143045143019 Aug 2021UTIB823000351167Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/144760/2021IN-PRINCIPLENo Data