PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-0217/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Chamba  (iii) Forest Division : Churah  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 9.3408  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Hydel
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Churah9.3408Protected Forest
Total 9.3408
Division 1. : Churah
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Chamba9.3408
Total9.3408
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
19.34080.0425Eco 6
Total. 9.3408


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersPiak (Alnus Nitida)960000
2OthersKail (Pinus Wallichiana)102034000
3OthersAihlan (Lyonia Ovalifolia)020000
4OthersKainth (Pyrus Pashia)310000
5OthersKhirk (Celtis Austrails)100000
6OthersMaral (Ulmus Wallichiana)341100
7OthersTosh (Picea Smithiana)000100
8OthersChalunj (Populus Ciliata)775000
9OthersMandari (Acer Coudatum)310100
10OthersJammu (Prunus Padus)351100
11OthersThangi (Carylus Columa)220000
12OthersDer (Toona Serata)020000
13OthersBadda (Salix Alba)3440000
14OthersMandu (Acer caesium)110000
15OthersHalew (Comus Macrpophylla)220000
16OthersBanj mohru (Quercus Dilatata)2040000
Total 98 6141 40 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 204

(iii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL

(iv) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Protection Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The Proposed alignment is not vulnerable to erosion and does not form a part of seriously eroded area as the strata of the land are quite stable
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.100
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : There are Monkey ,Fox , Piegon ,sparrows are found present arround the areas
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 43.43
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1118.70chiuliTissaChiuli    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NOC WILDLIFE
2 Undertaking of Payment the additional/differential amount to HPSFDC
3 CERTIFICATE REGARDING SUITABILITY SELECTED FOR COMPENSATORY PLANTATION
4 COST BENEFIT RATIO
5 undertaking cat plan
6 npv of Hail Hep
7 VALUE OF TREES
8 joint inspection of hail
9 JUSTIFICATION FOR LOCATING THE PROJECT
10 part-2

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Chamba652200245516120.221932240.443815/12/2020240.44380
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
ChurahChambaDFOYesOne04/12/2020
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
ChurahChambaDFO RecommendedOut of various alternatives studied the proposed scheme attached for the Forest clearance comprising of Intake basin on right side of Chenni Nallah, underground HRT and Power house on right side of Chenni Nallah has been considered as the best option in view to utilize the best combination of head and discharge with the minimum unavoidable forest land involved
ChambaCF Recommended Recommended as per the justification report of DFO Churah.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended22/04/2021 RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShimlaRegional Office8B/HP/01/45/202107/06/2022
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/HYD/52179/2020HYD521792020353389576683895766827 Sep 2022732328Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/HP/HYD/52179/2020Approved In-PrincipleNo Data