PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : AP-095/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh  (ii) District : East Godavari  (iii) Forest Division : Kakinada  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 1.64  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Kakinada1.0437Reserved Forest
Total 1.0437
Division 1. : Kakinada
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1East Godavari1.0437
Total1.0437
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.04370.6Eco 2
Total. 1.0437


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Misc. SpeciesAare011000
2Misc. SpeciesAnem000010
3Adina cordifoliaBandaru000110
4Misc. SpeciesBodda011200
5Bombax CeibaBuruga000020
6Misc. SpeciesBusi022420
7Lagerstroemia ParvifloraChennangi001010
8Misc. SpeciesChilaka duddiga033310
9Misc. SpeciesChirumanu065950
10Misc. SpeciesGarugudu013100
11Ziayphus xylopyraGotti010000
12Gmelin ArboreaGummadi001010
13Terminalia ChebulaKaraka034300
14Xylia XylocarpaKonda Tangedu021191370
15Misc. SpeciesKoramanu001100
16Mangifera IndicaMamidi001050
17Misc. SpeciesManga021000
18Aegle MarmelosMAredu024000
19Misc. SpeciesMollika035000
20Misc. SpeciesNalla Gatha081000
21Terminalia TomentosaNallamaddi0499200
22Semecarpus AnacardiumNalla jeedi014100
23Artocarpus HeterophyllusPanasa000010
24Misc. SpeciesPandriga041300
25Cassia FistulaRela030000
26Grewia TiliaefoliaThada056300
27Terminalia BellaricaThani040210
28Diasporus Melanoxylon001000
29Emblica Officianalisusiri011000
30Misc. SpeciesVandanam002310
31Misc. SpeciesVelaga010010
32Madhuca indicaVippa010110
33Pterocarpus MarsupiumYegisa0128120
34Misc. SpeciesYerrakarra001000
Total 0 7980 6763 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 289


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area proposed for diversion is highly vulnerable to soil and land erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : The road passes through Perisivalasa RF-I&II in Co
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Area is a suitable habitat for wildlife like Leopard, Indian gaurs, Sloth bear, Sambar, Barking Deer etc.,
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
111.0437Perisivalasa RF I & IIRampachodavaram55, 56    View file

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 the proposal is not recommended

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1East Godavari1082112333600768.109281800.54128/02/2019112.0871633.454
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
KakinadaRajahmundryDFOYesOne17/01/2019
 RajahmundryCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
KakinadaRajahmundryDFO Not-Recommendedthe proposed area for diversion of 1.0437 Ha in reserve forests of Rampachodavaram Range for formation of road from Gurthedu to Revadikota in favour of the Executive Engineer, TW Division, Rampachodavaram as the road may cause several adverse effects to the existing natural forests and wildlife by way of causing Soil erosion, habitat loss & Habitat fragmentation for wildlife. The disturbance can have detrimental effects on the existing flora and fauna during and after road formation. Hence, the proposal is not recommended
RajahmundryCF Not-RecommendedRejected based on the recommendation of the D.F.OYes