PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : AP-038/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh  (ii) District : Cuddapah  (iii) Forest Division : Cuddapah,Proddatur (WL)  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.04  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Cuddapah0.02Reserved Forest
2Proddatur (WL)0.02Reserved Forest
Total 0.04
Division 1. : Cuddapah
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.020.4Eco 3
Total. 0.02


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersJaana1310000
2OthersNeeruddi100000
3OthersPachari1610000
4OthersGotika500100
Total 35 20 10 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 38


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Light erosion at the top of the hill. Most of the forests have hilly, hence there is no such vulnerability to the erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The fauna noticed indirectly are Bear (Ursidae), Wild boar (Sus scrofa), Peacock (Pavo cristatus, Jungle fowl (Gallus), Sambar (Rusa unicolor)
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed diversion area is less i.e. 0.02 ha, hence the impact on the project is negligible.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed diversion area is less i.e. 0.02 ha, hence the impact on the project is negligible.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO) (i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1.616
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Part-II Offline-Kadapa-Div
2 Recommendation Certificate by DFO, Kadapa
3 Tree Enumeration-Kadapa-Div
4 NPV-Kadapa-Div
5 Site Inspection by the DFO, Kadapa
6 13 Certificates issued by the DFO-Kadapa
7 CA Scheme-Kadapa-Div
Division 2. : Proddatur (WL)
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Cuddapah0.04
Total0.04
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.020.4Eco 3
Total. 0.02


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersTella Poliki140000
2Red SandersRed Sanders510000
3OthersYerri Chilla700000
4OthersVelama200000
5Grewia TiliaefoliaJana300000
6OthersNeeruddi100000
7Zizyphus XylopyrusGotika100000
Total 20 50 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 25


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : As per working plan the proposed diversion area in Compt. No. 76 & 80 of Bayanapali and Balasingapalli Beats of Proddatur Range falls in Core and Eco-Sensitive Zone area of Sri Lankamalleswara Wildlife Sanctuary. The diversion area forms part of Tiger Corridor connecting two major protected areas i.e. The Nagarjunasagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve and S.V. National Park, Tirupathi and it is at a distance of 1.00 Km from the boundary of Sri Lankamalleswara Wildlife Sanctuary.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Light erosion due to gradient slope
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1.00
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Panther, Bear, Wild boar, Hare, Jungle fowl and Spotted Deer
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed diversion area is less i.e. 0.02 ha, hence the impact on the project is negligible.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The proposed diversion area is less i.e. 0.02 ha, hence the impact on the project is negligible.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed diversion area is less i.e. 0.02 ha, hence the impact on the project is negligible.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO) (i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1.690
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
110.25Chennamukapalli RFProddaturCompartment No. 76    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Impact of Project on adjoining forests
2 Working Plan prescriptions
3 Distance from PA
4 Recommendation of DFO
5 Site Inspection of Diversion area

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Cuddapah15359005002951544.20322606.84331/08/2019263.3194358.189
2Cuddapah411003171984301.2617462.3231/07/2019441.401122.070
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
CuddapahKurnoolDFOYesTwo16/10/2019,17/10/2019
Proddatur (WL)KurnoolDFOYesOne28/08/2019
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
CuddapahKurnoolDFO RecommendedRecommended
Proddatur (WL)KurnoolDFO RecommendedThe proposed diversion area is very less i.e. 0.02 ha and the impact of the project to the flora and fauna is negligible. Hence it is recommended
KurnoolCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Andhra PradeshState SecretaryRecommended14/02/2020 RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data