View Form A Part II

PART-II

(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)

State Serial No. of proposal : AP-039/2017

1. Location of the project/Scheme : Andhra Pradesh

(i) State / Union Territory : Andhra Pradesh (ii) District : Krishna (iii) Forest Division : Krishna (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 890.43 (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others

2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion

S. No.	Division	Forest Land(ha.)	Legal Status
1	Krishna	890.43	Section 16
Total		890.43

Division 1. : Krishna

3. District wise area to be diverted in the division

S. No.	District	Area(ha.)
1	Krishna	890.43
Total		890.43

4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion

(i) Density of vegetation

S. No.	Area(in ha.)	Density	Eco-Class
1	890.43	0.6	Eco 4
Total.	890.43

(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL

S. No.	Scientific Name	Local Name	(0-30)cm.	(31-60)cm.	(61-90)cm.	(91-120)cm.	(121-150)cm.	(>150)cm.
1	Albizzia lebbeck	Dirisinam	0	2	1	0	0	0
2	Azadirachta Indica	Vepa	0	38	6	0	1	0
3	Prosophis Juliflora	Tumma	0	2	0	0	0	0
4	Acacia leucophloea	Tella Tumma	0	15	7	1	0	0
5	Thespesia Populenea	Tedla Pala	0	36	3	0	0	0
6	Billudu	Billudu	0	9	3	0	0	0
7	Others	Are	0	0	11	0	0	0
8	Boswellia Serrata	Anduga	0	0	0	0	1	0
9	Others	Balusu	0	0	1	0	0	0
10	Others	Adavimamidi	0	0	0	1	1	0
11	Moringa oleifera	Munaga	0	1	3	0	0	0
12	Thapasi	Thapasi	0	1	0	0	0	0
13	Usiri	Usiri	0	0	1	0	0	0
14	Terminalia Arjuna	Tellamaddi	0	1	0	0	0	0
15	Others	Yerra Pachari	0	2	2	0	0	0
16	Acacia leucophloea	Tella Tumma	0	6	0	0	0	0
17	Others	Uuduga	0	7	0	0	0	0
18	Diasporus Melanoxylon	Tuuki	0	3	0	0	0	0
19	Cassia Fistula	Rela	0	23	0	0	0	0
20	Cassia Siamea	Seema Tangedu	0	1	0	0	0	0
21	Syzigium Cumini	Neredu	0	1	0	0	0	0
22	Others	Sandra	0	26	0	0	0	0
23	Somi	Somi	0	2	0	0	0	0
24	Others	Veluturu	0	2	0	0	0	0
25	Velaga	Velaga	0	9	0	0	0	0
26	Others	Ullinda	0	18	7	0	1	0
27	Others	Togara	0	4	0	0	0	0
28	Others	Tella Poniki	0	6	1	0	0	0
29	Thada	Thada	0	36	9	0	0	0
30	Santalum Album	Srigandam	0	8	0	0	0	0
31	Zizyphus Jujuba	Regu	0	1	0	0	0	0
32	Raavi	Raavi	0	0	0	0	2	0
33	Others	Putta Pala	0	8	0	0	0	0
34	Others	Ponthangi	0	6	2	0	0	0
35	Others	Musti	0	3	2	0	0	0
36	Others	Mushini	0	27	2	0	0	0
37	Others	Nagoor	0	3	0	0	0	0
38	Others	Nakkera	0	0	1	0	0	0
39	Others	Nalla Puniki	0	2	2	0	0	0
40	Others	Muriki Nimma	0	24	0	0	0	0
41	Zizyphus Jujuba	Nallaregi	0	41	7	0	0	0
42	Others	Pisiki	0	4	0	0	0	0
43	Others	Peddagummadi	0	0	0	0	1	0
44	Others	Peda Pisiki	0	6	0	0	0	0
45	Others	Pamthangi	0	1	0	0	0	0
46	Others	Pala	0	1	0	0	0	0
47	Others	Pachari	0	19	13	8	6	0
48	Others	Oddhi	0	3	0	0	0	0
49	Others	Bankanakkari	0	1	0	0	0	0
50	Others	Battaganapa	0	3	0	0	0	0
51	Others	Billa Ragi	0	0	1	0	0	0
52	Others	Brahma Medi	0	1	0	1	0	0
53	Others	Burratumma	0	3	0	0	0	0
54	Others	Chilakadidduru	0	5	0	0	0	0
55	Others	Chilla	0	25	1	1	0	0
56	Tamarindus Indica	Chintha	0	24	27	29	64	0
57	Chinduga	Chinduga	0	22	4	1	0	0
58	Others	Chirumaanu	0	27	1	0	0	0
59	Others	Devadaaru	0	2	0	0	0	0
60	Others	English Tumma	0	3	0	0	0	0
61	Others	Manchipala	0	32	6	0	0	0
62	Others	Maddi	0	29	1	0	0	0
63	Others	Machipala	0	7	0	0	0	0
64	Sepandus Emerginatus	Kunkudu	0	7	4	1	1	0
65	Ixora Parviflora	Korivipaala	0	20	0	0	1	0
66	Others	Korintha	0	23	1	0	0	0
67	Others	Kondaregi	0	2	0	2	1	0
68	Others	Konda mamidi	0	0	0	1	0	0
69	Others	Kommi	0	2	0	0	0	0
70	Pongamia Pinnata	Kanuga	0	5	0	0	0	0
71	Others	Kanchana	0	2	0	0	0	0
72	Others	Karu mulaga	0	0	0	0	1	0
73	Others	Julpiri	0	4	0	0	0	0
74	Dalbergia Latifolia	Jitregi	0	2	0	0	0	0
75	Anacardium Occidentale	Jeedi	0	0	0	0	1	0
76	Psidium Guajava	Jama	0	1	0	0	0	0
77	Others	Jaana	0	4	0	0	0	0
78	Others	Gumpena	0	18	28	4	1	0
79	Others	Gotti	0	14	0	0	0	0
80	Others	Garugu	0	42	23	4	2	0
81	Bamboo	Bamboo	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total			0	738	181	54	85	0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)			1058

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Degraded Forest Improvement working Circle,NTFP Working Circle and Protection working Circle

6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area is not vulneable to erosion in view of existing vegetation cover. The vulnerability for erosion is minimum.

7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.00

8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view

(i).

Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Hare (Oryctolagus Cuniculus), Spotted Dear (Axis, Axis), Mongoose (Herpestidae),Cobra (Naja naja), Pea Cock (Pavocristatus), Panther (Panther pardus) & Python (Pythonide)Sambar (Rusa unicolor, Udumu (Varanus)

(ii).

Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No

(iii).

Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No

(iv).

Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No

(v).

Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No

9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any

(i).

Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No

10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion

(i).

Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes

11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed

(i).

Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No

12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL

13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA

Patch Wise Details
S.no	District Name	Village	Area(in ha.)	khasra	KML file	Present Owner file
1	Kadapa	Mittamanupalli	900.55	1424

(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:

(iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:

(iv). Copy of CA scheme details:

Additional information Details

S. No.	Documents	Remarks
1		No volition Certificate,Historical Monument and All Annexures are English only.
2		Growing Stock value
3		Extraction Estimate

14. District Profile

S.no	District Name	Geographical area of the district (in ha.)	Forest area of the district (in ha.)	Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)	No. of Approved Cases	Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)	Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)	A) Forest land (in ha.)	B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1	Krishna	8796	66424.27	2150.74	27	949.88	31/03/2017	719.29	22.55

15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land

Division Name	Circle	Site inspected By	Whether site inspected	No. of times site visited	Site inspection report	Date of visit
Krishna	Rajahmundry	DFO	Yes	One		27/10/2017
	Rajahmundry	CF	Yes	One		08/11/2017

(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))

16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason

Division	Circle	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Reason	Whether CF agreed
Krishna	Rajahmundry	DFO	Recommended	Area proposed by the User Agency for diversion of 890.43 Ha in Kondapalli Reserved Forests of Krishna Division, Vijayawada for capital city infrastructure developmental works in Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh is essential, in view of importance given to Government of Andhra Pradesh. Hence the proposal may be considered.
	Rajahmundry	CF	Recommended	Recommended	Yes
		Nodal Officer	Recommended	Recommended

Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)

17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)

State	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Recommendation Date	Remarks	Signing Authority	Notification	Recommendation Letter
Andhra Pradesh	State Secretary	Recommended	12/12/2017	Recommended	State Govt. Officer	No Data