PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
AP-039/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Andhra Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Andhra Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Krishna
(iii)
Forest Division :
Krishna
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
890.43
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Krishna
890.43
Section 16
Total
890.43
Division 1. : Krishna
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Krishna
890.43
Total
890.43
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
890.43
0.6
Eco 4
Total.
890.43
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albizzia lebbeck
Dirisinam
0
2
1
0
0
0
2
Azadirachta Indica
Vepa
0
38
6
0
1
0
3
Prosophis Juliflora
Tumma
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
Acacia leucophloea
Tella Tumma
0
15
7
1
0
0
5
Thespesia Populenea
Tedla Pala
0
36
3
0
0
0
6
Billudu
Billudu
0
9
3
0
0
0
7
Others
Are
0
0
11
0
0
0
8
Boswellia Serrata
Anduga
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
Others
Balusu
0
0
1
0
0
0
10
Others
Adavimamidi
0
0
0
1
1
0
11
Moringa oleifera
Munaga
0
1
3
0
0
0
12
Thapasi
Thapasi
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Usiri
Usiri
0
0
1
0
0
0
14
Terminalia Arjuna
Tellamaddi
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Others
Yerra Pachari
0
2
2
0
0
0
16
Acacia leucophloea
Tella Tumma
0
6
0
0
0
0
17
Others
Uuduga
0
7
0
0
0
0
18
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tuuki
0
3
0
0
0
0
19
Cassia Fistula
Rela
0
23
0
0
0
0
20
Cassia Siamea
Seema Tangedu
0
1
0
0
0
0
21
Syzigium Cumini
Neredu
0
1
0
0
0
0
22
Others
Sandra
0
26
0
0
0
0
23
Somi
Somi
0
2
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Veluturu
0
2
0
0
0
0
25
Velaga
Velaga
0
9
0
0
0
0
26
Others
Ullinda
0
18
7
0
1
0
27
Others
Togara
0
4
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Tella Poniki
0
6
1
0
0
0
29
Thada
Thada
0
36
9
0
0
0
30
Santalum Album
Srigandam
0
8
0
0
0
0
31
Zizyphus Jujuba
Regu
0
1
0
0
0
0
32
Raavi
Raavi
0
0
0
0
2
0
33
Others
Putta Pala
0
8
0
0
0
0
34
Others
Ponthangi
0
6
2
0
0
0
35
Others
Musti
0
3
2
0
0
0
36
Others
Mushini
0
27
2
0
0
0
37
Others
Nagoor
0
3
0
0
0
0
38
Others
Nakkera
0
0
1
0
0
0
39
Others
Nalla Puniki
0
2
2
0
0
0
40
Others
Muriki Nimma
0
24
0
0
0
0
41
Zizyphus Jujuba
Nallaregi
0
41
7
0
0
0
42
Others
Pisiki
0
4
0
0
0
0
43
Others
Peddagummadi
0
0
0
0
1
0
44
Others
Peda Pisiki
0
6
0
0
0
0
45
Others
Pamthangi
0
1
0
0
0
0
46
Others
Pala
0
1
0
0
0
0
47
Others
Pachari
0
19
13
8
6
0
48
Others
Oddhi
0
3
0
0
0
0
49
Others
Bankanakkari
0
1
0
0
0
0
50
Others
Battaganapa
0
3
0
0
0
0
51
Others
Billa Ragi
0
0
1
0
0
0
52
Others
Brahma Medi
0
1
0
1
0
0
53
Others
Burratumma
0
3
0
0
0
0
54
Others
Chilakadidduru
0
5
0
0
0
0
55
Others
Chilla
0
25
1
1
0
0
56
Tamarindus Indica
Chintha
0
24
27
29
64
0
57
Chinduga
Chinduga
0
22
4
1
0
0
58
Others
Chirumaanu
0
27
1
0
0
0
59
Others
Devadaaru
0
2
0
0
0
0
60
Others
English Tumma
0
3
0
0
0
0
61
Others
Manchipala
0
32
6
0
0
0
62
Others
Maddi
0
29
1
0
0
0
63
Others
Machipala
0
7
0
0
0
0
64
Sepandus Emerginatus
Kunkudu
0
7
4
1
1
0
65
Ixora Parviflora
Korivipaala
0
20
0
0
1
0
66
Others
Korintha
0
23
1
0
0
0
67
Others
Kondaregi
0
2
0
2
1
0
68
Others
Konda mamidi
0
0
0
1
0
0
69
Others
Kommi
0
2
0
0
0
0
70
Pongamia Pinnata
Kanuga
0
5
0
0
0
0
71
Others
Kanchana
0
2
0
0
0
0
72
Others
Karu mulaga
0
0
0
0
1
0
73
Others
Julpiri
0
4
0
0
0
0
74
Dalbergia Latifolia
Jitregi
0
2
0
0
0
0
75
Anacardium Occidentale
Jeedi
0
0
0
0
1
0
76
Psidium Guajava
Jama
0
1
0
0
0
0
77
Others
Jaana
0
4
0
0
0
0
78
Others
Gumpena
0
18
28
4
1
0
79
Others
Gotti
0
14
0
0
0
0
80
Others
Garugu
0
42
23
4
2
0
81
Bamboo
Bamboo
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
738
181
54
85
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1058
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Degraded Forest Improvement working Circle,NTFP Working Circle and Protection working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Area is not vulneable to erosion in view of existing vegetation cover. The vulnerability for erosion is minimum.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Hare (Oryctolagus Cuniculus), Spotted Dear (Axis, Axis), Mongoose (Herpestidae),Cobra (Naja naja), Pea Cock (Pavocristatus), Panther (Panther pardus) & Python (Pythonide)Sambar (Rusa unicolor, Udumu (Varanus)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Kadapa
Mittamanupalli
900.55
1424
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
No volition Certificate,Historical Monument and All Annexures are English only.
2
Growing Stock value
3
Extraction Estimate
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Krishna
8796
66424.27
2150.74
27
949.88
31/03/2017
719.29
22.55
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Krishna
Rajahmundry
DFO
Yes
One
27/10/2017
Rajahmundry
CF
Yes
One
08/11/2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Krishna
Rajahmundry
DFO
Recommended
Area proposed by the User Agency for diversion of 890.43 Ha in Kondapalli Reserved Forests of Krishna Division, Vijayawada for capital city infrastructure developmental works in Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh is essential, in view of importance given to Government of Andhra Pradesh. Hence the proposal may be considered.
Rajahmundry
CF
Recommended
Recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Andhra Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
12/12/2017
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×