PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-055/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
East Singhbhum
(iii)
Forest Division :
Dalbhum
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
99.256
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Dalbhum
53.788
Reserved Forest
2
Dalbhum
0.065
Protected Forest
3
Dalbhum
45.403
jungle-jhari land
Total
99.256
Division 1. : Dalbhum
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
East Singhbhum
99.256
Total
99.256
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
99.256
0.71
Eco 3
Total.
99.256
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Shorea Robusta
Sal
52167
8987
499
356
604
419
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Asan
270
24
2
2
0
0
3
Acacia Arabica
Accacia
68
3
2
15
14
20
4
Cassia Fistula
Amaltash
21
4
2
1
0
0
5
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
599
309
7
0
1
0
6
Terminalia bellerica
Bahera
29
2
10
7
4
2
7
Melia Azadirachta
Baken
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Ficus Bengalensis
Bargad
0
3
1
0
0
3
9
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
2
4
3
0
0
0
10
Semecarpus Anacardium
Bhelwa
130
20
61
25
1
0
11
Others
Bhurkund
40
13
2
2
0
1
12
Cassia Siamea
Chakundi
62
51
71
43
14
2
13
Alstonia Scholaris
Chatni
59
74
16
2
0
0
14
Holoptelia integrifolia
Chilbil
21
11
3
7
6
2
15
Others
Dhautha
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Doka
1259
353
29
16
8
3
17
Others
Dumar
13
11
0
0
0
0
18
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
329
27
24
54
77
79
19
Erythrina Indica
Farhad
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
Gmelin Arborea
Gamhar
34
6
0
0
0
0
21
Ailanthus excelsa
Ghorkaranj
41
18
7
3
2
0
22
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
0
2
0
0
0
0
23
Others
Gurikaram
107
19
1
3
0
1
24
Terminalia Chebula
Hare
3
0
3
2
0
0
25
Tamarindus Indica
Imli
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
180
19
11
41
28
45
27
Anthocephalus Cadamba
Kadam
16
4
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Kaj
17
1
1
1
0
0
29
Anacardium Occidentale
Kaju
81
120
37
0
0
0
30
Adina cordifolia
Karam
382
160
56
18
5
4
31
Others
Karanj
10
3
0
0
0
0
32
Others
Kari
74
9
2
1
0
1
33
Others
Kantel
21
8
4
4
0
0
34
Others
Kathsagwan
210
55
23
17
1
1
35
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Kend
2778
48
11
7
14
49
36
Others
Koraiya
1
0
0
0
0
0
37
Others
Kusum
1
1
0
0
0
0
38
Madhuca indica
Mahua
159
39
2
2
3
1
39
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
53
24
15
6
7
1
40
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Paisar
36
4
0
0
0
0
41
Others
Pandan
1
0
0
0
0
0
42
Others
Pepro
110
20
3
1
1
0
43
Others
Piyar
208
62
345
327
30
3
44
Others
Raipan
16
3
2
0
2
0
45
Others
Ratangora
4
0
1
1
1
0
46
Others
Rohan
176
109
24
8
8
1
47
Albizia Procera
Safed Siris
11
7
4
0
2
0
48
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
413
145
24
3
1
0
49
Bombax Ceiba
Semal
2
1
3
1
1
0
50
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
3
3
0
1
0
0
51
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Sidha
7
0
0
0
0
0
52
Alberia Lebbac (Dirshanam)
Siris
4
0
0
0
1
0
53
Mangifera Indica
Aam
0
0
0
2
0
0
54
Others
Amra
0
0
1
0
0
0
55
Borasis Flebilifer
Taar
0
0
0
1
1
0
56
Moringa oleifera
Vanmunga
1
0
0
0
0
0
57
Others
Aankda
1
1
0
0
0
0
58
Others
Sawra
2
0
0
2
0
2
59
Dendrocalamus Strictus
Bamboo
0
0
0
0
0
4538
Total
60233
10789
1312
982
838
5178
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
79332
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The forest land proposed for diversion comes under the coppice with standard working circle, Rehabilitation cum soil and moisture conservation working circle and plantation working circle in the working plan. Hence, Soil and moisure conservation, silviculture operation and plantation can be prescribed where ever necessary.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Forest area is vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Bat, Bear, Peacock, Hyaena, Jackal, Jungle Cat, Elephant, Hare, Langur, Mouse, Cobra, Rock Python, Karait, etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
614.30723
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
15
Kuchiyakanali
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 379
View file
2
2
35
Punda
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 380
View file
3
3
18
Bardi
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 39
View file
4
4
1
Choraigora
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 64
View file
5
5
6
Pithati
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 38
View file
6
6
30
Sapdhara
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 533
View file
7
7
5
Jhariya
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 471
View file
8
8
35
Gudgudiya
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 470
View file
9
9
25
Karariya
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 582
View file
10
10
28.512
Bagghori
Chakulia
Ghatshila - 244
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Cost-Benefit Analysis
2
Undertaking for Environmental Clearance of the Project
3
Undertaking for compliance of conditions stipulated by state government/ Department of Forest
4
Undertaking regarding FRA
5
Justification
6
Undertaking in respect of NPV
7
Form - A (PART-I)
8
Tree Enumeration Report
9
Land Schedule for Proposed Dhalbhumgarh Airport
10
Undertaking in respect of Compensatory Afforestation
11
Processing Form (Part-II)
12
Undertaking regarding NPV
13
Authorisation to Shri Vinod Sharma for signing/ processing / uploading the forest clearance proposal.
14
DGPS Survey Report for Proposed Dhalbhumgarh Airport
15
NOC of Denotified Forest Land (Deemed Forest)
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
East Singhbhum
353300
108069
1535.4165
23
1157.05
31/03/2022
935.42
194.54
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Dalbhum
Jamshedpur
DFO
Yes
Two
22/03/2022,10/06/2022
Jamshedpur
CF
Yes
Two
22/03/2022,10/06/2022
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Dalbhum
Jamshedpur
DFO
Recommended
Jharkhand has been moving firmly ahead on path of development and striving hard to achieve all round development of state. However, there are several obstacles are present which can decelerate the momentum of development, lack of infrastructure is one of them. One of the most lacking infrastructure in state is "Airport". As we know, Jharkhand has only one operational airport at Ranchi which is insufficient to cater the whole state. lt is a proven fact the airport can boost socio economic status of the town/city dramatically because air connects people but it connects economies to further develop the global economy. Jamshedpur is not only important industrial town not only in Jharkhand but also recognized industrial towm of India but it still lacks air connectivity. People travel to the town only through Ranchi airport. Peoples leave Jamshedpur at least six hour before the time of flight to reach Ranchi airport, it is waste of precious time of them. not only The fast growing and established industrial town Jamahedpur immediately needs an airport to increase its contribution in economic developrment of state and country. Sonari Aerodrome at Jamshedpur is not suitable for comnmercial flights of ATR 72 and above categories, due to its short runway length and non possibility of its proper extension. Airports Authority of India and Govt of Jharkhand tried hard to find a suitable place to construct airport but due to huge urbanization and geographical reason, no suitable place is available near the town. The most and only suitable place is Dhalbhumgarh around 55 km from Jamshedpur . This place already has a defunct structure of runway as it was used as an airport at the time of Second World War. Hence the ion of place is justified.
Jamshedpur
CF
Recommended
Airport at the proposed site would have adverse affect on the flora and fauna. The said area falls near documented Elephant corridor “GAJAH” – Ghatshila Kakrajhor, Musabani Chakulia, Dumaria Kundaluka Murkanjia. There were several incidences of Man – Elephant conflict in and around the proposed area in the past. Construction of Airport would adversely affect the watershed of the region. The Airport can boost socio economic status of the region and would contribute in economic development of the state and country. The proposal may be accepted with the condition to take mitigation measures to contain the adverse affect, on flora and fauna.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand
State Secretary
Recommended
25/07/2024
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×